Category: government

  • What businesses should learn from Wikileaks

    What businesses should learn from Wikileaks

    The Wikileaks Cablegate affair has been entertaining us now for two weeks as we see diplomats and politicians around the world squirming with embarrassment as we learn what US diplomats really think about the foreign powers they deal with.

    Both the leak of the cables and the treatment of Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange, by various Internet companies raises some important questions about the Internet, cloud computing and office security in the digital era.

    Security

    It’s believed the source of the leaked cables is Private First Class Bradley Manning, who is alleged to be responsible for leaking the Iraq tapes released by Wikileaks earlier this year.

    The lesson is don’t give junior staff unrestricted access to your data, access to important information such as bank account details, staff salaries and other matters best kept confidential needs to be protected.

    You can stop data leaving the building by locking USB ports, CDs and DVDs through either software or hardware settings on your computers and you should ask your IT support about this, keep in mind that locking down systems may affect some of your staff’s productivity.

    Locking the physical means though doesn’t stop the possibility of data being sent across the Internet and access logs may only tell you this has happened after the fact. So it’s important to review your organisation’s acceptable use policy. Check with your lawyers and HR specialists that your staff are aware of the consequences of accessing company data without permission.

    Incidentally, the idea that Pfc Manning was just one US Army staffer of thousands who were able to access these cables raises the suspicion that the information Wikileaks is now releasing was long ago delivered to the desks of interested parties in London, Moscow, Tel Aviv, Beijing and cave hideouts in remote mountain ranges.

    Don’t rely on one platform

    Wikileaks found itself hounded from various web hosting and payment providers. As we’ve discussed previously, relying on other people’s services to deliver your product raises a number of risks. Make sure you have alternatives should one of your service providers fail and never allow an external supplier to become your single point of failure.

    Concerns about the cloud

    This column has been an unabashed fan of cloud computing, but the Wikileaks saga shows the cloud is not necessarily secure or trustworthy. Not only is there the risk of a PFC Manning working at the data center compromising your passwords or data, but the arbitrary shutdown of Wikileaks’ services is a stark lesson of relying on another company’s Terms of Service.

    Within most terms of service are clauses that allow the provider to shut down your service if you are accused of breaking the law or straying outside of the providers’ definition of acceptable use. As we saw with Amazon’s treatment of Wikileaks, you can be cut off at any time and without notice.

    Amazon’s shutting down of Wikileaks is a pivotal point in the development of cloud services. Trust is essential to moving your operations to the cloud, and Amazon’s actions shown much of that trust may be misplaced.

    Should you be considering moving to the cloud, you’ll need to ensure your data and services are being backed up locally and not held hostage to the arbitrary actions of your business partner.

    Don’t put your misgivings in writing

    So your business partner is a control freak? Great but don’t put it in writing.

    Be careful of gossip and big noting

    One interesting aspect of Wikileaks to date is how senior politicians like gossip and showing how worldly they are to US diplomats.

    That’s great, but it probably isn’t a good idea to tell your best friend they should consider beating up your most important customer. As mentioned earlier, this little gem was probably on polished desks of the Chinese Politburo long before the cables found their way to Wikileaks.

    Resist the temptation to gossip, remember your grandmother’s line about not saying anything if you can’t say something nice.

    Ultimately what Wikileaks shows us is all digital communications are capable of being copied and endlessly distributed. In a digital economy, the assumption has to be that everything you do is likely to become public and you should carry out your business conduct as if you will be exposed on Wikileaks or the six o’clock news.

    Wikileaks is a lesson on transparency, we are entering an era of accountability and the easiest way to deal with this is to be more honest and open. That’s the big lesson for us in our business and home lives.

    Similar posts:

  • Where next for the consumer society?

    Anand Giridharadas in his NY Times article on A Yearning for the Soul in Two Nations describes how he believes some in India and China are seeking alternatives to the affluence models of the developed world. He says;

    “In this view, there is too much mimicry of Western models, regardless of their fit. There is too much attention to money, and not enough on culture and values. Journalists, Mr. Ji said, don’t ask him what he thinks or how China might be changed; they concentrate on his Forbes rich-list ranking.”

    But is this really a Western value, or the result of a half-Century of consumerism?

    Up until the Second World War, most Western societies operated just like the “traditional” societies of Asia where extended family and the community looked after their old and sick with it being quite normal for four generations to be living in one small house.

    Post World War II, the advent of the nuclear family and increased material wealth allowed us to dispatch Nana to the nursing home, where we’d expect the state to pay for her dotage. This allowed debt laden working age families to get on with working two jobs to bring up two kids in a five bedroom house on the outskirts of town where we could retreat away from the surrounding community into the soft comforts of mass entertainment.

    Has that model of the consumer society reached it’s limits?

    In the West, the last two decades have been focused on ever elaborate mechanisms to put consumers, government and societies into greater debt in order to sell more plasma televisions, bigger cars and empty bedrooms in oversized McMansions. In turn government borrowed more to sustain the illusion that this material wealth could be enjoyed throughout retirement.

    The Global Financial Crisis was the undoing of this as the mechanism to continually fund debt and bankers profits stretched to its limits and finally broke. Today, we have the bankers being bailed out by governments which in turn have to be bailed out by supra-national organisations like the IMF or European Union.

    While Anand’s right in pointing out that some Indians and Chinese are questioning the Western style rush for consumer driven growth, it would be wrong to assume that nobody in Europe, North America or Australasia questioned this as well.

    In the west, these voices were drowned by the obvious attractions of having a ice cream maker and espresso machine in every kitchen but they were there nevertheless. Today they are being heard.

    We in the developed nations have reached the maximum point of the consumer society – we have enough plasma TVs in our households and many of us have reached the limits of how fare we can commute in a day. We were able to sustain this for a while after we passed the point we could afford it as cheap credit became easier to obtain but even that is now exhausted.

    So we’re looking at a period where consumer spending is not going to drive the world’s developed economies the way it has for the past few decades.

    In some respects this will mean a nominal reduction in our standard of living as we won’t be able to buy that third car, fifth iPad or go on overseas holiday every year and it will mean some industries based on the extremes of consumer spending will shrink.

    But overall it may not be a bad thing as it will force us into spending more time with our local communities and families with our incomes and debts being tempered to more sustainable levels. We’ll invest in sustainable and important matters like our health and environment rather than speculate on overleveraged assets.

    This will be great challenge to businesses and industries built around servicing every increasing consumer demands and many won’t cope with the change. Are we, and our governments, prepared for this change?

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • ABC Nightlife Digital, 12 October 2010

    There’s been a lot of talk about the National Broadband Network, join Rod Quinn and Paul Wallbank to discuss what the NBN means to you.

    We’ll be taking listeners’ calls to debate, explain and discuss the issues, costs and technology questions surrounding this massive project.

    Please note that this segment will be going out on the ABC Local Digital Network in capital cities as the Commonwealth games will go out on the analogue network.

    If you are outside of the capital cities, you can stream the program through the ABC Nightlife website. If you’d like to join the conversation with your questions or comments phone 1300 800 222 within Australia or +61 2 8333 1000 from outside Australia.

    You can SMS Nightlife’s talkback on 19922702 or twitter @paulwallbank using the #abcnightlife hashtag

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Thoughts on Media140

    This post was part of the Media 140 Australian Politics of which I was kindly invited as a guest blogger. The focus on the afternoon panel is because this was the specific session I was asked to cover by the organiser, Julie Posetti.

    After an election what panelist and political cartoonist First Dog on the Moon
    described as “three months of despair” a review from a panel of cartoonists,
    photographers and other outliers of the Australian political journalism was always
    going to be well received.

    First Dog’s comments showed the general despair by the electorate at large towards
    a bland performance by both major political parties, particularly in their use of new
    media tools.

    The rest of the afternoon panel on “alternative views on political news” shared First
    Dog’s general attitude, but luckily they made up for that despair with an entertaining
    and funny take on the election and pricking some of the pomposity that can surround
    the social media communities.

    Malcolm Farnsworth (@mfarnsworth) put this best when he described much of
    Twitter as “ego, brown nosery and wankery”. Surprisingly this was taken well by the
    room.

    His point is valid though, we need to keep in mind that one of the attractions of social
    media is we can choose our own friends, particularly in Twitter where we can restrict
    our social circle to those we like and agree with.

    A few of the questions from the floor recognised this as did Julian Morrow
    (@moreoj) with a shameless plug for The Chaser’s iPhone App. In an earlier session
    Claire Wardell had shown how new media isn’t just Twitter and tools like apps and
    clever websites can drive the political discourse just as well as a witty tweet.

    Julian also showed how The Chaser crew were ahead of the curve with taking a
    failed newspaper empire online in the late 1990s. Although his line about Twitter giving “the monkeys the typewriters” also betrayed a Rupert Murdoch style bitterness towards
    new media.

    To further move the issue from social media, Peter Bowers (@mpbowers) raised
    the issues of photographers’ rights and payments, citing the Hudson River plane
    crash as a good example where an agency snapper would have received some
    large rights payments for the early photos of the aircraft floating down the river.

    Peter moved into another aspect of social media and the perils for photographers
    when talking about Parliamentarians taking photos from the floor of the house. In
    the Australian Parliament, there are strict rules about the use of images and he had
    once been bought before the Privileges Committee for breaching the rules with the
    possibility of gaol time for contempt of Parliament.

    What this illustrated in Peter’s opinion was how laws haven’t kept up to date with
    technology. We could also say it’s another example of how people don’t understand
    the real time consequences of seemingly trivial online actions.

    As one of the final sessions for the day, the session was good opportunity to liven up the room with some funny, out of the box and thinking that shot down the thought that the day would be a Twitter love-in.

    Overall, Media140 was a success in examining how the new online tools are changing
    politics and the reporting of it. Having Claire Wardell’s UK perspective and Jeffrey

    Bleich’s view from the Obama campaign showed just how far Australia has to go with
    these tools.

    Probably the biggest message was from the journalist participants – it’s clear many are
    uncomfortable with the public being able to work around the gatekeepers and some
    are downright scared of the abuse they think they receive from the community.

    “It’s all about getting paid” one journalist said. You can’t help but think that was the
    same thing bleated by the loom weavers of 200 years ago.

    What we saw from the OzPolitics Media140 is a community and society in great
    change: The political parties, media and the electorate are working through how these
    tools are going to change the way we vote and how our governments work.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • An appropriate broadband policy

    On Radio National’s Life Matters Paul joins Richard Aedy, Jane Bennett and Peter Cox to discuss what the appropriate broadband policy should be for Australia.

    Our previous discussions on this are covered in our Freeways of the Future article and presentation.

    Some of the topics we’ll be looking at include;

    • if we choose to go with the est $43b broadband fibre to the door policy – does this mean they’ll be coming along digging up the street to lay cables into every yard?
    • if we don’t do this but choose to rely on wireless connection from hubs – what does that mean for reliability of internet connection?
    • how do any of the options compare to the current speeds Australian cities, and rural and remote regions have?
    • are we over-building if we proceed to take fibre to every household in the country?
    • are we simply ensuring that we will be ready for expansion of services on the internet?

    The show is live at 9.00am Australian Eastern time and will podcast on the Life Matters site shortly afterward.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts