<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Decoding the new economy &#187; future summit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulwallbank.com/tag/future-summit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulwallbank.com</link>
	<description>Business in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Summit 2: Artificial divides</title>
		<link>http://paulwallbank.com/2009/06/02/the-future-summit-2-artificial-divides/</link>
		<comments>http://paulwallbank.com/2009/06/02/the-future-summit-2-artificial-divides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wallbank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulwallbank.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took a lot from the <a href="http://paulwallbank.com/2009/05/24/the-australian-future-summit/">Melbourne Future Summit</a>, many good and some worrying.

One of the worrying aspects was the hostility from the "creative thinkers" towards Engineers and scientists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a lot from the <a href="http://paulwallbank.com/2009/05/24/the-australian-future-summit/">Melbourne Future Summit</a>, much of it good and some of it worrying.</p>
<p>One of the worrying aspects was the hostility from the &#8220;creative thinkers&#8221; towards Engineers and scientists.</p>
<p>This was apparent in the Innovation Imperative seminar where many of the panel&#8217;s and audiences&#8217; comments were notable for their hostility towards Engineers and scientists along with their view it was time for some &#8220;creative thinking&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most of questioners from the floor went as far to blame Engineers and scientists for the Global Financial Crisis.</p>
<p>This is odd as scientists and Engineers are no more responsible for the banking sector&#8217;s financial engineering any more than artists are responsible for the bankers&#8217; creative accounting.</p>
<p>Creating artificial barriers between &#8220;creative&#8221; and &#8220;scientific&#8221; thinkers is dangerous and foolish. Our greatest Engineering and scientists are creative thinkers by definition. Many great artists have applied science to their work.</p>
<p>If we force people into these pigeon holes where an Engineer can&#8217;t be creative and an artist can&#8217;t use science then we are all the poorer for it and less equipped for the challenges ahead of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paulwallbank.com/2009/06/02/the-future-summit-2-artificial-divides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

