Tag: incubators

  • Founder therapy and Smiley curves – the tough world of hardware startups

    Founder therapy and Smiley curves – the tough world of hardware startups

    There’s no doubt building a hardware startup is hard, whether it’s sensor networks, smart lights or home automation hubs getting physical products to the market is far tougher than launching an online service or app.

    In a light industrial part of San Francisco’s Inner Mission district, the Highway One incubator is one of the initiatives looking at helping entrepreneurs bring their ideas to market.

    “Our goal is to help hardware startups scale faster,” says Brady Forrest the director of Highway One. “We turn prototypes into products. People come here with an idea and we make sure they can implement it, we bring a lot of design best practices and engineering best practices and make sure they are being honest with themselves.”

    “I also end up conducting a lot of founder therapy.”

    The selection process

    Getting onto the four-month program is competitive with applicants being subjected to a rigorous vetting process, “they fill out a double page application, send in a video of them telling their story and then a video of them using a prototype.”

    “Then we start to talk with some business analysts to check the market sizes, competitors and then we go to an engineering review to check the team has the technical chops and that prototype is what they say it and that it’s achievable.”

    Once on the program the course is an intense immersion on building a product with access to a prototyping lab, support services and a 10-day trip to Shenzhen, China, to learn about global manufacturing.

    The Shenzhen link is important as Highway One is part of PCH International, an Irish company born out of founder Liam Casey’s case work in sourcing Chinese manufacturers. This Fortune magazine profile of Casey and PCH describes how deeply embedded the company is in global supply chains.

    Want investors want

    At the end of the incubator process is a pitch day before potential investors. Right now Forrest says, “I think investors want to de-risk as much as possible. Right now hardware is so expensive and it’s higher risk. Yet in a lot of ways it’s easier in a lot of ways for people to know what they’re getting.”

    smiling_curve

    Part of the challenge in funding hardware startups lies in financing the fabrication phase of the product’s development. Forrest cites the ‘Smiley Curve’, originally described by Acer founder Stan Shih, where the value added is at the beginning and ends of the cycle.

    “The VC’s don’t like to fund the build part, one nice thing for startups is that they can get manufacturers will take on the build part so they don’t have to seek funding for working capital”

    Hardware’s next wave

    For investors, this makes funding hardware startups easier for investors. “It’s still not easy though,” Forrest warns. “It’s become harder for hardware startups to raise new rounds, so they have to watch their burn.”

    While at the moment a lot of the focus is on wearables and the IoT, Forrest sees the Federal Drug Administration’s new rules on medical accessories changing the sort of devices being pitched to the program.  “I now think we’re moving into a new field where the devices will have an effect on the body. The FDA’s new rules around making it easier to make things around FDA approved devices will open that.”

    He’ll find out soon what the next big thing is in hardware startups as applications for Highway One’s May 2016 round of participants is now open.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Telstra adds Singapore to its Muru-D startup network

    Telstra adds Singapore to its Muru-D startup network

    Today Aussie incumbent telco Muru-D opening in Singapore.

    Muru-D is loosely based on Telefonica’s Wayra incubators that the Spanish telco has set up across Europe and Latin America.

    Wayra’s fortunes have been mixed recently with the incubators coming off badly in the company’s restructure last year and it’s interesting that Telstra are copying the model of opening in strategic neighbouring markets.

    Complicating matters is Telstra’s Singapore based rival Singtel has its own chain of incubators Singtel Innov8. Singtel’s model is different in that they sponsor incubators, Sydney’s Fishburners for example, rather than set up their own Wayra or Muru-D style operations.

    So Telstra’s moving into Singapore could be seen as another move by the Aussie incumbent to take on Singtel on it’s own home ground, something that will be assisted by the recent acquisition of PacNet.

    Also notable is the Singaporean government’s support for Telstra’s with Kiren Kumar, Director of Infocomms & Media at the Singapore Economic Development Board, welcoming the launch as enhancing the city’s repuation as “the innovation capital of Asia”.

    Telstra’s move is another showing how telcos are trying to move out of being utilities along with Telstra’s need to grow out of the domestic Australian market it now dominates.

    For Telstra both moves are well outside the company’s historical expertise, it will be interesting to see how successful they are.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Measuring an industrial hub’s success

    Measuring an industrial hub’s success

    A short article appeared on London’s City AM website yesterday discussing the successes of Google’s Campus and the government’s Tech City initiative.

    What jumped out of that story is the quote from Benjamin Southworth, the former deputy chief of the Tech City Investment Organistion, that London’s first tech IPO is “probably 18 to 24 months away”

    Southworth’s comments raise the question of how do you measure the success of initiatives like Tech City, does a stockmarket float indicate success of business or tech cluster?

    The debacle of Australia’s Freelancer float which saw the shares soar over 400% on the first day of trading certainly doesn’t indicate anything promising about the startup scene down under apart from the opportunities for those well connected with insiders on Australian Security Exchange traded stocks.

    In London’s case, Google’s Campus gives a far better indicator of what tech hubs and industrial clusters can add to an economy – £34m raised from investors in the 12 months to October 2013, 576 jobs created and 22,000 members of its coworking space.

    Google’s statistics raise an interesting point about the different objectives for the stakeholders in incubators and hubs; entrepreneurs want money or glory, investors want returns, corporate backers want intellectual property or marketing kudos, governments want jobs and politicians want photo opportunities with happy constituents.

    These different objectives means there are different measures for success and one group’s success might mean bitter disappointment for some of the others.

    What the various partners define as success is something anyone involved in an incubator or hub should consider before becoming involved, in that respect it’s like a business or a marriage.

    Similar posts: