Tag: security

  • Can the community secure the Internet of Things?

    Can the community secure the Internet of Things?

    As more devices become connected Cisco Systems hopes the security issues can be addressed by the developer community.

    “The Internet of Everything is not only turn every company into a technology company but its going to force every company to truly become a company that delivers security,” says Christopher Young, Senior Vice President of Cisco’s Security Business Group.

    Speaking at the Australian Cisco Live! Conference in Melbourne today, Young described how business is going to have to change the way it treats the data it collects from sensors.

    “Not just in consumer security,” continues Young. “If I’m using technology or I’m delivering a service that’s leveraging technologies like cloud or connected devices and creating information about individuals or organisations through these connected devices then a consumer or enterprise is going to expect a level of security.”

    Young sees three major ways that security is becoming more challenging for organisations; changing business models, a dynamic threat landscape and increasing complexity.

    The latter point is the area that focuses many executive’s attention in Young’s experience with audiences he speaks to nominating complexity and fragmentation as their greatest concern.

    “They get so many products and so many devices and so many tools and so much complexity they really don’t know, in so many cases, where to focus their efforts.”

    Young cites Cisco’s Chief Security Officer, John Stewart, that the most fundamental security defence is getting the basics right.

    Earlier this year at the release of the company’s 2014 security report, Stewart spoke to Networked Globe on how businesses are struggling with the complexity they face.

    “Even the most sophisticated and well funded security teams are struggling to keep on top of what’s happening,” Stewart said.

    This problem ties into the other areas that Young identifies, particularly the ‘industrialisation’ of the malware world.

    “We have more well funded, more innovated, more determined adversaries than we’ve ever had as an industry.

    “It used to be some high school kid in his room trying to infect a bunch of machines with viruses or some guy from Nigeria sending you an email asking you for a hundred bucks and he’ll give you a thousand bucks later.

    “The world we live in today has nation states and criminal syndicates and very well funded, very sophisticated attackers so hacking has become an industrialised activity.” Young says, “here’s supply chains involved, there’s support agreements written; the bad guys will even sell each other a contract.”

    Young’s views echo those of Sophos Labs’ Vice President Simon Reed who said last year that “now there’s money involved, there’s serious effort, the quality of malware has gone up.”

    Part of the solution Young sees involves getting the community involved which is the motivation behind the Cisco Security Challenge announced last week.

    “You can only just guess and imagine what all the different security challenges will look like in a world that’s just starting to get formed.”

    “Let’s get the community involved in trying to solve some of the problems that we know are going to be inherently introduced by IoE.”

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Using data laws to create an economic advantage

    Using data laws to create an economic advantage

    Yesterday I posted piece on Business Spectator about Australia’s new privacy regulations, little did I know that the European Union Parliament was about to release its own.

    The EU regulations look interesting and certainly seem on  first look to be far more comprehensive than Australia’s effort that I describe as a toothless, box ticking exercise.

    A notable aspect of the EU’s announcement of the new rules is its claim that the updated regulations are expected to generate €2.3 billion in economic benefits each year.

    Whether the EU’s rules prove to be an economic cost – as Australia’s effort will almost certainly turn out to be – or a competitive advantage remains to be seen, however the European Parliament is certainly making a case for data security and privacy protection as being an important selling point in a highly competitive digital world.

    The competitive advantages between countries and continents in the 21st Century will be vary different to those that determined the economic winners of the previous two centuries.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Accountability and security

    Accountability and security

    Security writer Brian Krebs has followed up last year’s story that US credit reporting agency Experian had been selling personal data to Singaporean based identity thieves with the guilty plea from the scheme’s architect.

    Krebs points out that the leader of the identity thieves, Vietnamese national Hieu Minh Ngo, could access up to 200 million consumers’ records.

    It’s almost impossible to say how much theft, fraud and misery was inflicted on innocent Americans who had their personal details misused by Ngo’s customers.

    The amazing thing is it appears that Experian’s executives or shareholders will not suffer any sort of penalty – civil or criminal.

    In an age where companies are collecting masses of data on everyone, it’s inconceivable that those trusted to store and protect that information – particularly credit reporting agencies – seem beyond any accountability for failing in their core responsibilities.

    There’s also the aspect of undermining the US credit system; if merchants and consumers find they can’t trust credit reporting agencies, then offering or getting credit becomes far more difficult and risky.

    Until the management of companies like Experian are held accountable for their incompetence, any talk of safeguarding privacy is empty. It’s why we should treat claims that our data is held safely by government agencies or businesses with a great deal of caution.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • Bill Gates and the fight for trustworthy computing

    Bill Gates and the fight for trustworthy computing

    Microsoft’s task of securing its software was a huge undertaking, one that isn’t over yet.

    One of the great, and possibly under recognised, business achievements of the computer age was Bill Gates’ recognition that Microsoft’s online strategy was flawed shortly after releasing Windows 95. A few years later he had to repeat the task when the company found its products were almost dangerously insecure.

    In a sprawling account of the company’s response to the security problems at the turn of the century, Life In The Digital Crosshairs, describes how Microsoft’s engineers responded to their then CEO’s call for Trustworthy Computing.

    The problems at the time were vast, compounded by Microsoft’s failure to take security seriously – the first version of Windows XP came out without a firewall which ensured thousands of users were quickly infected by the computer worms rampant on many ISPs networks at the time.

    As the story tells, it was a long difficult task for Microsoft to change complex and interdependent computer code involving 8,500 of the company’s engineers.

    One suspects the cultural challenges were even greater in getting the managers supervising the army of engineers to understand just how serious the security threat was to Microsoft’s users.

    The biggest challenge though was Microsoft’s own product line; because the company hadn’t ‘baked’ security into its software, key products like Microsoft Office relied on lax security practices to work properly.

    Office and Windows also had the problem of legacy code and applications; one of Microsoft’s selling points over Apple and other competitor systems was that the company took pride in supporting older hardware and software, this in itself creates security risks when programs designed in the MS-DOS days still want to write to the system kernel.

    For Microsoft the journey isn’t over, although the shift to cloud computing has changed – and simplified – the company’s security quest by making legacy issues in Office and Windows less important.

    Microsoft and Gates’ success in seeing off the threats posed by the internet gave the company another decade of computer industry dominance, however dealing with security issues was nowhere near successful.

    In the end however it wasn’t security issues that saw Microsoft lose its dominance; the internet eventually prevailed as Apple revolutionised mobile computing while Amazon and Google improved cloud services.

    With Bill Gates reportedly finding himself getting more involved in the company he founded, the challenges of both the internet and security are two that he’s going to be very familiar with. It will be interesting to see what we write about Microsoft in 2022.

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts
  • A breach of trust

    A breach of trust

    “Today I’m happy not to have an RSA Conference badge on me;” Mikko Hypponen, head researcher of Finnish security company F-Secure told the inaugural TrustyCon conference in San Francisco yesterday.

    Hypponen was referring to what was one of the world’s most prestigious information security conferences hosted by industry vendor RSA.

    RSA are known to many corporate computer users for their SecurID authentication tags; the little key fobs that give a passcode for secure networks that illustrate this post.

    Sadly for RSA’s users those tags were compromised in 2010 and the company did its best to obscure, if not downright hide, the problem both from the industry and its customers.

    However the killer blow for RSA’s reputation was an article in Reuters at the end of last year claiming the US National Security Agency had paid the company $10 million to weaken its security protocols.

    The company denies this but the damage was done, as Hypponen says “When a security company can’t be trusted, what do they have left?”

    How the RSA lost the trust of security professionals is a good lesson for all of us; our businesses rely upon the goodwill of our customers and our peers. If we betray their trust, we’re hurting ourselves.

     

    Similar posts:

    • No Related Posts