Why hide your address?

If you have an online address, be it a web site, social media account, Google or Facebook Place page you need to tell your customers about it.

There’s a lot of concern about businesses not having a website with estimates that between 40 and 60% of all enterprises simply don’t have a website and most aren’t using social media.

Businesses who haven’t bothered setting up a site, or at least a free Facebook or Google Places listing are missing out on customers, but even many organisations with an online presence aren’t publicising them well.

A recent walk down my local shopping strip went past nearly 200 businesses. Of them only four had a reference to their website or preferred social media platform.

Even businesses do have a website didn’t choose to display them where customers or passers by could see them.

Worse, some of the fast food chains that are running social media campaigns had no indication that checking in or liking could win a customer a deal which makes you wonder just how committed those business are to these channels.

It could be that businesses are afraid that referring to their online presence will encourage customers to move away from their physical store, if that’s the case most business owners are wrong.

Customers are expecting to find our websites even if they intend to visit our stores or hire us. Our sites – even if they are only a free page from Google or Facebook – should be telling propective customers who we are, what we do, why are we great and what hours we’re open.

Just as time is money to the typical business person, shoppers want to make sure they are going to the right place for the right product and won’t be wasting their time if they show up on a Sunday afternoon or after 6pm.

There’s no reason not to have your web page, social media addresses and other online contact details somewhere prominent where customers can see them so they can see how great you are. Should your competitors be telling their story, they are going to be getting the customers.

In a noisy, busy world we need to telling our stories both online and offline, peoples’ attention and time is too scarce to let an opportunity go by.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

No, I don’t like you

Are social media services asking us to “Like” too many things?

Have you been asked to “Click ‘Like’ to find out more”?

As more businesses use Facebook and other social media channels as marketing tools, the ‘Like’ button has become one of the key performance indicators for the success or otherwise of a Facebook page.

So it’s not surprising to be required to ‘Like’ something to find out more about a business, product or competition – despite the latter often being against Facebook’s promotion guidelines.

The problem with hitting the ‘Like’ button is my name is associated with that page or comment which is then visible to my Facebook friends and liking the wrong things can cost real friendships and even jobs.

In social media forums like Facebook where there’s not even the pretence of anonymity, we are all accountable for our likes and dislikes. It creates part of our online persona and any observer is right to assume what we give a thumbs up on a social media site is what we like in real life.

That’s not too damaging if it’s just fluffy cat pictures or some innocuous soft drink but it can have real life consequences outside of a social media platform.

So no, I don’t like you because you have a Facebook page or a well executed social media strategy.

If I do like you, it will because you’re putting out a good product, I respect your work or because you are a friend in real life.

Random ‘Likes’ are a lousy measure of a business’ online success, they’re a lousy deal for the people who give them out as well.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

The web’s big weakness

How a hands-off customer model may doom many of today’s social media and web services

There’s a fundamental flaw in the way the tech industry does business, that weakness could be what ultimately kills many of today’s new media, web and social media services.

AirBnB, an online home share service, is one of the darlings of the booming Silicon Valley start up sector, having recently being valued at $1.2 billion after a successful capital raising.

Like most Web 2.0 and social media businesses, AirBnB’s advantage is in the low operating costs where customer support is left to the service’s peer review and social media communities while AirBnB pockets a commission for simply making the connection between the landlord and tenant.

The flaws in this “all care, no responsibility” model became apparent last month when a lady posted a description of her house being ransacked by an errant housesitter she found through AirBnB.

AirBnB’s management responded to the article with assurances they were helping and working with their affected customer, claims which were promptly contradicted by the original victim.

To make matters worse, certain prominent members of the Silicon Valley investment and blogging communities alluded she was lying or was “batshit crazy.” Now that other stories of bad AirBnB tenants are appearing, the view this is simply the untrustworthy word of a deranged customer affected by their first such incident is looking hollow.

Failing to deal with customer problems is not unique to AirBnB, hiding behind impenetrable layers of “support” backed up by user hostile terms and conditions is familiar to anyone who has had to deal with an online service gone wrong.

Last month Thomas Monopoly found he was locked out of his Google account and had it not been for the intervention of a senior Google employee, Thomas’ problem would probably still be stuck in an endless feedback loop.

Exactly the same problem has been encountered thousands of times by other users of web mail, social media, online auction and matchmaking sites.

Many of the people running these services retort their products are free so users get the support the support they pay for – an argument conveniently overlooking that most “free” web services are based around selling customer data – but even this does not justify delivering the basic services users have been lead to expect, regardless of what a 5,000 word user agreement states.

Today’s tech startups, and many of their big established cousins in the IT industry, have the idea that customer support is an optional extra and an expense to minimised or outsourced.

In this respect they are not too far removed from dinosaur car manufacturers or some of today’s less dynamic retailers offering little in the way of customer service or after sales support.

That way of working has died as consumers have been able to go online to vent their dissatisfaction, strangely today’s hot tech start ups seem to have missed this aspect of the revolution they have helped start.

Ignoring consumer problems is exactly what’s bringing traditional businesses unstuck in the online world. The funny thing is it might bring many of the online business undone as well.

Similar posts:

A question of respect

Do we give our business partners the respect we’d like to receive?

All too often a discussion of business leadership descends into a series of homilies and recycled stories equating corporate warriors to ancient Chinese generals.

In a time where we’re obsessed with the shiny toys of technology, we often forget that all business is social and leadership and respect are the keys to growing a successful enterprise.

Last week’s final session of the 2011 Let’s Talk Business series was refreshingly different with David James of Sydney’s Brasserie Bread, Mike Cannon-Brookes of software company Atlassian and business mentor Chris Witt telling their stories of leading growing enterprises.

Mike and David showed how real business leadership is about entrenching values within in an organisation that fosters consistently good service and great products.

David told how Brasserie Bread treat their retail partners with generous commissions and services that encourage cross selling illustrated the key difference between smaller businesses taking the long view and the short term views taken by corporate managers.

The cross selling and commission models work well for Brasserie Bread’s retailers, the customer comes into a shop to pick up their bread order, buys a coffee while they are there and – as they discover more about the business – they become a regular.

While there’s a great difference between a bakery and software company, Mike Cannon-Brookes had a similar view about values, telling how Atlassian has the “beer test” where they ask if a prospective employee would be interesting when talking over an after work drink.

Atlassian’s main mantra though is “don’t f*** the customer”, which is notable in a business world largely dominated by the belief you give the customer the minimum you can get away with.

Both Brasserie Bread’s and Atlassian’s philosophies can be boiled down to one word: Respect.

Respecting customers, suppliers, staff and resellers is something that’s forgotten by many larger businesses obsessed with short term gains at the expense of anyone foolish or unfortunate enough to do business with them.

The current problems of big retailers can be put down to that lack of respect; for suppliers as they screwed the last cent out of their supply chains, for staff as they crudely cut numbers to achieve their performance targets and for customers who found service had become a word with little meaning in their stores.

It would be unfair to pick on the retailers though as most large organisations share that attitude of disrespecting everyone who doesn’t sit on the same floor as the CEO.

Much of these beliefs on blindly cutting costs, outsourcing service and focusing on short term KPIs came out of 1980s thinking at consulting firms and management schools.

Although the schools and consultants have updated their thinking, many business leaders are stuck in that short term model which worked well during the two decades of easy credit we’ve went through up to 2008.

Chris Witt summed this short term thinking up well with his closing comment; “Neanderthal man’s survival strategy was short term, it didn’t do him much good.”

Respecting your business relationships is the key to long term survival in these uncertain times, we need to be insuring we show the respect to our staff, supplier, customers and partners we hope they would give us.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Reinventing webinars

How do we re-interpret webinars to deliver better results for presenters and audiences?

I’m currently preparing a Smart Company webinar on local search for business. Like most other presenters I prepare for a webinar by putting together a presentation on Keynote or Powerpoint and talk over it while the audience watch and listen over the web.

That’s pretty typical of most webinars, but I can’t help but think we’re doing this the wrong way by falling into the trap of appliying old techniques to new technologies.

In most industries we fall for this problem; when the motor car came along, our forefathers applied the ways of horse and carts to the new technology, going as far as calling them “horseless carriages”.

The movie industry is probably the best example of this. When movies first appeared, producers and writers applied theatrical techniques and it took a decade or so for them to figure out how to work best with the new media, then they had to relearn for talkies, followed by the arrival of TV and now the industry is adapting to Internet streaming.

In many ways we’re still in the “silent movie” phase of online presentations; we’re learning through trial and error what techniques work while inventing new tricks that take advantage of a personal screen.

So that gives rise to the question, how do we adapt our presentations that are designed for being presented to a room full of people to a more intimate online medium?

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Google+ explained

What does Google’s latest social media platform mean for the ordinary business or home Internet user?

The latest shiny thing in the online world is Google+, the search engine monolith’s latest attempt at a social networking service. What does it mean to the average user?

Google+ differs from most social networks – particularly Facebook – in that you can segment your online connections into different groups called circles so when sharing information such as comments, updates or photos you can choose to only let certain circles or individuals see those posts.

This addresses the biggest problem with social media; that what we share with our family is not necessarily what we want our friends or work colleagues to see, an issue identified by then Google designer Paul Adams, who has since moved onto Facebook.

At the core of Google+ is the Google Profile which is shared with most Google services such as Gmail and Blogger which gives rise to quite a few privacy concerns as those you share with can get access to this information, although this is the same with most other social media services.

Google+ has quite a few interesting features such as Hangouts which allow impromptu video conferences and Sparks which are random popups of things you might be interested based upon your search history and posts.

As a consumer product, Google+ doesn’t have the gaming and the social features that Facebook offers however that’s expected to change as the product develops.

For businesses, Google+ is off limits. Right now it is only open to individuals although we can expect that will change as Google integrate the product with their small business Places platform along with adwords and their online application service.

Right now Google+ is for the geeks and that’s why the tech media is talking about it. For the average home or business users it’s not quite ready to replace or complement Facebook or other social media services although it’s worth keeping an eye on to see how it evolves.

The stakes are quite high for Google with this product as the overwhelming amount of data at every Internet user’s fingertips is seeing people seeking out sources they trust for answers, recommendations and advice. The social aspect of the online world is going to define the web in this decade just as search did in the previous decade.

For this reason, Google are going to be working hard on making sure Google+ is part of the social web, for the average user we’ll be choosing the tools we trust. It remains to be seen if Google+ is one of those tools.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Password protection

Our passwords are valuable, how should we protect them?

The suspension of eighty students from a suburban Sydney high school once again illustrates how careless we often are with passwords and the access to our computers. In an era of Internet banking, online shopping and social media sites holding our personal details, we have to take web security seriously.

In many ways the teacher who let their password slip to their students was lucky. In the United States, authorities haven’t always been so forgiving these sort of mistakes, and in this case the kids and the system administrators were a lot more adult and responsible than their Connecticut counterparts.

What the incident does show is how the weakest points of our technology networks are ourselves – the most secure systems, toughest passwords and best anti-virus protection won’t help us if we don’t take care.

We looked at protecting organisations in an earlier post, Protecting your data, and here’s some steps on how to take care with your personal details.

Shut down computers

When you’re finished working, make sure you log out of email programs, secure sites, social media services and shut your computer down.

In an office context, this is very important if you’re going away for a meeting or a break as people have been known to use co-workers computers to access prohibited sites or sensitive information.

Should you be using Internet cafes, hotel business centres or airport lounges you should be doubly careful to make sure you’ve logged off completely before walking away from the shared computer.

Hide your passwords

As the teacher at Prairiewood High found, your password is gold. Do not divulge it under any circumstances.

Often doing so is almost certainly a breach of your organisation’s Acceptable Use Policy and sometimes this can mean disciplinary action or dismissal from a job. With your online banking, disclosing your password or PIN can mean you won’t be compensated if money is stolen from your account.

Even a seemingly trivial social media site can cause trouble for you if crooks can get onto it.

Having a complex password is good and we look at a neat little trick for memorable but tough passwords in our Protecting Your Data post, it’s worthwhile making sure your logins are both easy to remember while being secure.

Understand your AUP

An AUP, or Acceptable Usage Policy, is part of the conditions of you using a computer or online service. Many government and corporate networks have a box pop up forcing you to agree every time you login. Take time to occasionally read this.

Should you accidentally give away your password, say to a site that’s fooled you that it’s your bank or a social media site, the AUP will usually have a clause or a sentence on what to do in that situation. Understanding this will give you piece of mind if something does happen.

We’re now in an age where our personal information is more valuable than ever before and we need to guard what who has access to it. Passwords are going to be part of protecting our data for some time to come so understanding how to use them properly is essential.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts