Buying a new computer

While computers are a tool, they are unique in their flexibility, and every user has different needs. So these suggestions are based on pretty generic use – if you have a specific application, or you’re a high-end user, then you really need to make sure your system meets your requirements.

This article originally appeared in Smart Company.

After discussing tech purchases my Smart Company column two weeks ago, a few readers have asked what they should be looking for in a new computer.

The answer, like everything in IT, is “it depends”.

While computers are a tool, they are unique in their flexibility, and every user has different needs. So these suggestions are based on pretty generic use – if you have a specific application, or you’re a high-end user, then you really need to make sure your system meets your requirements.

CPU

Some people obsess about chip speeds and processor specs. The ugly truth is it barely matters for most users. Don’t sweat all the CPU mumbo-jumbo and leave the “front side bus” penis envy to others who don’t have work to do.

Hard drive

If you are connecting to a network, hard drive space isn’t critical. For a desktop computer, 320Gb drives are the standard entry point, and 160Gb for laptops. If you are running a home office or you handle lots of media files, then 750Gb or a terabyte (1000Gb) may be the way to go.
If you are considering netbooks then you will find hard drive space is far smaller, with as little as 9Gb; this is OK if you intend to store files on network servers or out on the internet cloud.

Memory

This is the easy bit – the more memory the better. All good value systems come with 2Gb and an upgrade to 4Gb is money well spent.

Graphics card

Video capacity is where cheap systems fall down. Many entry level systems use “shared memory” where the video system shares the work with the CPU. These systems perform dreadfully on Windows Vista and struggle to support higher resolutions.
Spend the extra and go for a video card with at least 256Mb of RAM. Many units have the option of going up to 512 and 764Mb, although I’d prefer to spend the money on system memory before video cards. Your view might be different to mine though.

Monitor

On desktops, the bigger the better. Go for a 20″, 22″ or 24″ monitor. Get two monitors and you’ll see office productivity soar.

Portables are a different kettle of fish. Personally I love the compact 7″ netbooks for their weight and size, but many people prefer 15″ screens. When choosing a laptop, you need to make a compromise between price, screen size and weight that meets your needs and budget.

Optical drives

DVD-R/W is still the way to go. You don’t save much by leaving the writing function out, and being able to burn disks from your system is handy. Ignore BluRay as it remains expensive with little take up in the market.

Networking

Some real cheap and nasty machines may still have 100Mbit ethernet. Avoid these like the plague. If it doesn’t have a gigabit ethernet don’t buy it.

Similarly, all laptops have wireless capabilities and the 801.11g standard (54Mbit) is the norm. Most laptops now have some version of the newer 801.11n standard, but keep in mind the final 801.11n standard won’t be released until the end of this year.

Warranties

Three years is the only way to go; don’t consider otherwise. If the computer is mission critical, a same day warranty makes sense, but most businesses go for next business day service to balance cost against reliability.

Mac or Windows

Whenever a SmartCompany blogger wades into the Mac versus Windows argument, Amanda Gome is delighted with the increased site traffic until the server melts down and the death threats start arriving.

Suffice to say, you should use whatever works best for you. It’s your equipment and your business, and no-one else has the right to tell you whether Microsoft, Linux or Apple are better.

Price

Overall, a good business computer to these specs will come in around $1500 for the desktop and $1800 for a portable. Add another 25% for Apple equipment, although the lifetime cost of ownership is around the same for Apple and Windows-based PCs.

That’s a rough idea what to look for when specifying computer systems for your office. Have a good look at your needs and budget and you should be able to find some good bargains to help your business work better.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

ABC 702 Weekends: How to run a sustainable computer

This Sunday Simon and myself will be looking at how to run computers in an evironmentally friendly and sustainable way.

This Sunday Simon and myself will be looking at how to run computers in an evironmentally friendly and sustainable way.

Tune in at 702 on your AM radio or stream us online from the ABC Website.

Your comments and questions are welcome so call in on 1300 222 702 or SMS on 19922702.

More information on our LinkedIn page.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Has Microsoft learned anything from Vista?

Microsoft have announced a release date for Windows 7. Have they learned anything from Vista?

CNet’s Ina Fried reports Microsoft has set an October 22 release date for Windows 7, their new operating system to replace the flawed and unpopular Windows Vista.

In an article earlier this year, Ina quoted Microsoft Senior Vice President Bill Veghte that Microsoft has learned important lessons from Vista.

One lesson they appear not to have learned is how multiple versions of the product confuses the marketplace and tarnishes their brand.

That we still have FIVE versions of the new system, and that they’ve locked themselves into a release date before the final Release Candidate version, doesn’t bode well for Windows 7.

As usual, the advice for most computer users will be to sit and wait until the first Service Pack is released. I wonder if Microsoft will repeat the bluff of claiming there will be no service pack which failed so dismally with Vista?

Let’s see if they’ve actually learned anything from the humiliation that was Vista.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

The Future Summit 2: Artificial divides

I took a lot from the Melbourne Future Summit, many good and some worrying.

One of the worrying aspects was the hostility from the “creative thinkers” towards Engineers and scientists.

I took a lot from the Melbourne Future Summit, much of it good and some of it worrying.

One of the worrying aspects was the hostility from the “creative thinkers” towards Engineers and scientists.

This was apparent in the Innovation Imperative seminar where many of the panel’s and audiences’ comments were notable for their hostility towards Engineers and scientists along with their view it was time for some “creative thinking”.

Most of questioners from the floor went as far to blame Engineers and scientists for the Global Financial Crisis.

This is odd as scientists and Engineers are no more responsible for the banking sector’s financial engineering any more than artists are responsible for the bankers’ creative accounting.

Creating artificial barriers between “creative” and “scientific” thinkers is dangerous and foolish. Our greatest Engineering and scientists are creative thinkers by definition. Many great artists have applied science to their work.

If we force people into these pigeon holes where an Engineer can’t be creative and an artist can’t use science then we are all the poorer for it and less equipped for the challenges ahead of us.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

ABC Nightlife, 28 May 2009

abcbanner_localI’ll be doing the May Nightlife with Tony Delroy and Laurel Papworth to discuss the business uses of Social Media.

Some of the topics we’ll cover are;

  •  how do we make sure that our photos, videos and jokes are seen only by our friends and not by the boss or our mum?
  • If you do lose your job, how can you use social media to get another one?
  • how can businesses use social networks to find staff?
  • explain how business and people can get loans through social networks
  • why workplaces don’t trust these tools and ban them
  • what downsides are there of social media? What are the legal traps and risks to your reputation?

We’ll be live across Australia on ABC Local Radio. The show starts at 10pm and we’ll be taking questions from around 10.30. Call in early on 1300800222 in Australia or +61 28333 1000 for international callers.

Tune in through your local ABC station or stream online through the Nightlife website.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

The Australian Future Summit

The Future Summit 2009 was two days of discussion on Australia’s future challenges and opportunies by the Australian Davos Foundation.

The idea is terrific – all too often Australia’s political, business and economic discussion is bogged down in soundbites and opportunism. So an event that gets people thinking beyond the next opinion poll or financial report is welcome.

While it did spark thinking, it was probably not in the way many attendees hoped.

Twitterer IRLDexter asked Suits,suits,suits… Does the style and conformity reflect the thinking?.

Sadly, the answer was “yes”.

The Future Summit showed the Australian establishment is pretty well homogeneous. There’s not a great deal of dissent among the nation’s political, public service, academic or business elites.

Probably the clearest example of groupthink was in the economic discussions. The various panels’ opinion of the future can be summarised with “Australia’s right mate; once the Chinese get their act together we’ll be back on track to a self funded, negatively geared retirement, powered by nuclear energy and clean coal”.

That’s nice, but that view really lacks vigour at the very least it’s a lazy view of Australia’s future direction. We need more heretics and more new ideas. 

On the economics front a few heretics, say a Steve Keen, might have pointed we need a plan B just in case the Chinese economy doesn’t come to our rescue.

The Future Summit is a great idea and hopefully its going to continue into the future, but to provide some real forward thinking and debate, we’re going to need more outsiders to upset the Australian establishment’s narrow view.

I look forward to next years summit. Hopefully we’ll have some heretics, entrepreneurs and younger voices to balance the establishment’s complacent conformity.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Computer hostility

While at the Sydney CeBIT last week, a speaker made a comment about how getting managers to accept social media is a big step given many  proudly complain they know nothing about computers and care even less.

A few days later when flying down to Melbourne for the Future Summit, I read an article by Glenn Wheeler telling how he smashed his computer after getting a virus, an act he said “sent a warm feeling through my body.”

Bizarre.

I’ve long lost count of the people who tell me they are proud to know nothing about computers but I still get rattled by people who are openly and proudly hostile to technology.

The problem for these people is they are being left behind, just like the Luddites they are well on their way to becoming a historical curiousity.

That’s fine for Glenn and other individuals, it’s good not to know anything about anything if you wish to be ignorant. But a business that chooses to ignore technology is quickly losing ground to smarter competitors.

Ignorance isn’t a good look at any time, but it’s even worse when it’s killing your business.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts