Category: business advice

The limits of SEO

Having a nice web site is only part of a winning business

On their busiest day of the year, the florist site Ready Flowers had a shocker. With dozens of customers upset their Valentines Day flowers didn’t arrive.

Their reaction was to stop answering their calls, as one Ready Flowers angry customer on the Whirlpoool website said;

Calling through to their 24/7 hotline was no good, all it told me (after 30 mins on hold) was a automated message saying it was valentine’s day (duh), that they were busy and that I should leave a message.

So on their one key day of the year, they didn’t have enough staff to meet demand.

Ready Flowers has been a success story expanding to 17 countries since being founded in 2005. The service is a modern version of the Interflora model where the company takes the order which they pass onto a local florist who creates the flower arrangement to Ready Flowers’ or Interflora’s specifications.

The risk for Ready Flowers is that the local florist isn’t very good and that’s where customer support and tight supplier management comes into place.

Which is clearly where they fell over on Valentines Day.

In a 2009 interview with the Financial Review that’s quoted in the Sydney Morning Herald, Ready Flowers’ founder Thomas Hegarty claimed his success was due to good search-engine optimisation, online advertising, and landing pages for every delivery location.

Missing is the term “customer service” – in that interview Thomas went onto say, “We saw that we could add value by applying more efficient technology without needing a large number of people to run the business”.

This is the flaw in the web 2.0 business model. In the real world, businesses don’t run on remote control – mistakes are made, deadline missed and people do dumb things which the algorithm can’t handle.

Over the last thirty years, customer service has been seen as an unnecessary cost centre. This was fine in a world where automated, low margin and fast moving goods were seen as the business model to emulate.

If you can’t compete on price, it’s service that matters and this is where you’ll need more than a lost cost call centre and a well optimised website.

Similar posts:

Finance by the masses

Can crowdfunding work for business?

“Crowd” is one of the hot terms of the moment – the idea that groups of connected, motivated people with the right incentives can deliver great value when their skills and talents are bought together.

One of application of this idea is crowdfunding where businesses, artists, writer and movie producers can call  on the community to donate or invest small sums into a project in return for a benefit like a copy of the book or being an extra in the movie.

The biggest success in this space is the New York based Kickstarter which was founded in 2008. Pozible, an Australian equivalent, that provides local creatives with the opportunity to raise funds without dealing with the hassles of US bank accounts or social security numbers.

Both of these services make money from taking a commission on the money raised, for Pozible users this fee ranges from 5 to 7.5%.

While the focus of Pozible and Kickstarter is on creative projects like books, music and movies, it’s interesting to consider how this model can work for other businesses.

Perhaps an IT business can offer a free year of support or food delivery service free shipping in return for a donation. The possibilities are endless.

It’s not without risks – there’s no doubt the regulators will at best be suspicious of fund raising through these services and anyone participating has to accept the risk of not getting any sort of return.

Since the 2008 banking crisis, funding for small business has dried up around the world. Many viable enterprises found their lines of credit being withdrawn and some even went under as a result.

With banks rationing small business credit, there’s a need – we could even argue an economic necessity – for alternative sources of capital. Crowdsourcing could be an option.

Now the days of easy credit are over; businesses, banks, investors and governments have to adapt. Believing models and regulations that were designed when capital was cheap and abundant won’t work in a very changed economy.

Crowdsourcing will be one of the issues confronting regulators, it’s going to be interesting to see how they deal with it.

Similar posts:

Scammed

Social media opens up new opportunities for conmen

“Executive-level income without leaving home” claims the Facebook page, a sign at the end of my street promises a six figure wage from your own computer and one of the lead stories in this morning’s news is the tale of retirees being ripped off by ‘boiler rooms’ offering high return ‘investments’.

We all believe we have the right to be rich so the quick, easy option and the promises of those that say we can be wealthy by simply handing over a modest amount of money or trusting our investments to someone else is a tempting offer.

Deep down we know we’re being scammed.

Right now nations are on the verge of collapse because politicians promised easy wealth, corporations skirt bankruptcy because executives were entitled to bonuses regardless of performance and in the suburbs desperate people clinging to the middle class lifestyle they believed was theirs by birthright fall for get rich quick scams.

Just as the railways opened up opportunities for snake oil merchants in the 1850s and cheap telephone systems gave rise to the boiler room ripoffs of the 1970s and 80s, social media tools open up a whole new range of possibilities for the sneaky to fool the gullible or desperate.

Naturally we’ll get the nanny goats and nincompoops demanding something be done about Internet scams – maybe a law, perhaps a treaty or a code of conduct – all of which will be as effective as stopping railways, telephones or the postal system in an effort to stamp out fraud.

Fraud is technologically neutral; fraudsters just use whatever happens to be the most effective tools available at the time.

The sad thing with the social media based scams is we get to see who among our friends and family have fallen for it. Invariably when we warn them we’re told off because we aren’t believers.

Again though this is nothing new, the same thing happened when the snake oil merchant came to town or the shaman visited the village.

In the 19th Century the phrase “there’s a sucker born every minute” was coined. In today’s hyper connected world, there’s one born every second. Don’t be that sucker.

Similar posts:

On becoming a Captive Business

On being trapped by your suppliers or customers

I’ve been writing a lot recently about the risks of businesses aligning their interests too closely with one or another platform, last weekend The China Law Blog discussed the opposite – being a captive customer.

The term “captive customer” is new to me but it’s a familiar concept; in the IT industry most of us found ourselves hostage to Microsoft’s whims at one time or another and it wasn’t a good place to be.

Many smaller businesses and consultants fall for the trap of having just one big customer which their income becomes dependent upon.

While Dan’s point on The China Law Blog is about manufacturing, this risk is becoming even more pressing on the web where there’s a tendency to be captured by one platform or another.

Sometimes entire industries are captured – the Search Engine Optimisation sector is wholly dependent upon whatever Google chooses to with their search algorithm. To make things worse, no SEO expert knows exactly how Google’s equations actually work.

We’re seeing the mass media being captured in a number of ways – by granting licenses to Facebook, one suspects unwittingly, or developing content for Apple’s iPad.

For startups depending upon cloud services or single payment platforms like PayPal there are serious risks as we saw with the co-ordinated takedown of Wikileaks.

In nature, the animal or plant that depends on one source of food or habitat is at risk from even small changes in their environment. Be careful you aren’t a business dodo.

Similar posts:

The New Soviets

For many companies, customer service owes more to the Soviet Union

US based investment writer Mike “Mish” Sherlock called Sony’s support line to get a repair for his recently purchased laptop computer.

What followed was something from the 1970s Soviet Union – a simple request turned into a twelve day, 34 step odyssey of structural incompetence on the part of Sony.

The tragic thing is Mike’s tale is all the result of mis-matched rewards in Sony’s organisation;

  • Sony’s management wanted to increase profits
  • Extended warranties were identified as a revenue generator
  • A senior manager decided cutting support costs would improve returns
  • The technical support is outsourced
  • Costs are saved by splitting contracts
  • Each outsourcer has a different IT platform
  • The outsourcing contracts have quotas and penalties
  • Individual staff are penalised for escalating problems
  • Support staff have tight performance criteria

At every level performance indicators were met, despite the whole process costing far more than fixing the problem efficiently would have had – not to mention the loss of Mike as a customer – something that Sony can ill afford.

Not surprisingly, the computer ended up being fixed by a local IT guy. Richard almost certainly earns a fraction of Sony’s Executive Vice President Group General Managers, or whatever the title they have to match their compensation packages is, yet he gets the job done.

In Sony we see the Soviet model of management at work – an unaccountable, out of touch cadre of apparatchiks meeting their requirements under The Five Year Plan and are rewarded accordingly.

Just like today’s Executive Vice President Group General Managers with their KPIs and bonuses.

As we all know, the Soviet Union failed in 1991. One wonders when we’ll say the same thing about Sony or the dozens of other large corporations that have lost their way.

Similar posts:

Paying the piper – the cost of the internet’s walled gardens

The web’s walled gardens have a real business cost

With the web increasingly dominated by four major, and many minor, fiefdoms the cost of being part of those groups is gradually becoming clear.

As part of Facebook filings in advance of their public float they published the key agreements with their developer partners including that with games provider Zygna, technology journalist Tom Foremski has a disturbing look at Facebook’s conditions that illustrate the costs and risks.

In terms of the costs, Tom identifies Clause 2.1 of Facebook’s “Statement of Rights and Responsibilities” – shown as Annex 1 in the Developers  as probably the biggest price for all content creators;

… you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (“IP License”). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.

So by sharing something on Facebook, you grant Facebook the right to do what they like with what you’ve created. That’s something worth thinking about.

For anybody trying to make a living off Facebook, it’s important to consider they also retain the right to throw you off the service at any time. From clause 4.10 of the Statement Of Rights Annex;

If you select a username for your account we reserve the right to remove or reclaim it if we believe appropriate (such as when a trademark owner complains about a username that does not closely relate to a user’s actual name).

So get into a trademark dispute with a big corporation – and often their lawyers cast a very wide net on potential similar spellings – and your account is shut down.

There’s also the specifics of the Zynga agreement that should concern anyone investing in the games company. Right at the beginning of the agreement we see this clause;

The parties further acknowledge that Zynga is making a significant commitment to the Facebook Platform (i.e., using Facebook as the exclusive Social Platform on the Zynga Properties and granting FB certain title exclusivities to Zynga games on the Facebook Platform). In exchange for such commitment, [*] the parties have committed to set certain growth targets for monthly unique users of Covered Zynga Games.

So Zynga is closely tied into the fortunes of Facebook, we knew that on a business level but now we know just how deep and binding the agreements are.

We should be clear, all the major social media and online services have similar clauses on intellectual property and copyright infringements; there’s no shortage of businesses who’ve been caught out by eBay or Paypal and plenty of people found their Google accounts shut down by their obsession with real names.

For all businesses the message is clear – be careful before committing totally to one online platform or another. Should you end up in a dispute, or find you’ve backed the wrong service, it may be a very costly process to get your company off that platform.

Similar posts:

The Internet Kool-Aide Machine

Don’t buy the hype when you read about the hot new product

Every few months, the web lights up with hype about the latest technology or website. For a few weeks, every tech conversation mentions this hot new product.

Almost always this hype is driven by the company in question duchessing a few key “opinion leaders” in the tech, social media or other circles. These folk start writing up this product and, if they are lucky, the stories get picked up by the broader media and the product becomes “hot.”

The aim is to find the greater fools, for the investors and founders of these business they want to cash out by selling the operation to a bigger entity.

When you read the hype about the latest user generated, online sharing social media service that’s growing at a remarkable rate be aware you’re actually seeing a pitch to a big company being framed along the lines that “you can’t afford to miss out.”

By all means sign up to the service to have a look but don’t buy the hype and remember you’re not the customer – the gullible big business manager looking for the next big thing is.

Image courtesy of Blary54 through sxh.hu

Similar posts: