Category: economy

Burying capitalism with the Internet of Things

Burying capitalism with the Internet of Things

A strange piece by author Jeremy Rivkin in The Guardian argues the internet of things will facilitate an economic shift from markets to collaborative commons which threatens capitalism as marginal costs fall to zero.

Rivkin argues that the rise of the ‘prosumer’, who contributes content and adds economic value for free, is undermining the basic tenants of capitalism.

A telling blow to capitalism in Rivkin’s eyes is the abundant data generated by the Internet of Things;

Siemens, IBM, Cisco and General Electric are among the firms erecting an internet-of-things infrastructure, connecting the world in a global neural network.

There are now 11 billion sensors connecting devices to the internet of things. By 2030, 100 trillion sensors will be attached to natural resources, production lines, warehouses, transportation networks, the electricity grid and recycling flows, and be implanted in homes, offices, stores, and vehicles – continually sending big data to the communications, energy and logistics internets.

Anyone will be able to access the internet of things and use big data and analytics to develop predictive algorithms that can speed efficiency, dramatically increase productivity and lower the marginal cost of producing and distributing physical things, including energy, products and services, to near zero, just as we now do with information goods.

That Rivkin mentions large corporations like Cisco, Siemens, IBM and General Electric illustrates the flaw in his idea — these companies are profiting from the Internet of Things and the data it’s generating.

Rather than being killed, capitalism is evolving to the new marketplaces.

Nowhere is this truer than in the sharing economy where the new lords of the digital manor are  profiting from the work and free content generated by unpaid ‘prosumers’.

How long the free business models can survive is open to question, in many respects the age of the digital sharecropper is a transition phase that isn’t sustainable and it’s more likely we’re seeing a move to an economy where information is far more abundant than it was previously.

Such a change is not unprecedented, far more basic human needs are food and energy. In Western economies, we have been living in a time of unimagined abundance of both for the last century.

In subsistence economies, food and the energy to grow or hunt it is scarce and its why living standards are low and life expectancies are short. Agricultural society start to solve the food scarcity problem and industrial societies automate farming and increase living standards through abundant energy.

During the pre-industrial era, the basic unit of energy was the horse – hence the term horsepower – and it was rare to have more than four horses driving a coach or piece of machinery.

Today, we have locomotive engines that provide 6,000 horsepower, a basic farm tractor delivers around 100 HP  and a typical family car around 200. We live in an age of abundant energy and our living standards reflect it.

We’re moving into an era of abundant information that will change our societies in a similar way to the age of abundant power has changed economies over the past 300 years.

Open source, the sharing economy and the internet of things will all change aspects of our economies and society but people will still be making a living one way or another so they can buy a meal and pay their rent.

The age of abundant information means massive change to the way we work, but it no more means the end of capitalism than the steam engine did.

Similar posts:

Using data laws to create an economic advantage

Will the EU data laws give European business a competitive advantage?

Yesterday I posted piece on Business Spectator about Australia’s new privacy regulations, little did I know that the European Union Parliament was about to release its own.

The EU regulations look interesting and certainly seem on  first look to be far more comprehensive than Australia’s effort that I describe as a toothless, box ticking exercise.

A notable aspect of the EU’s announcement of the new rules is its claim that the updated regulations are expected to generate €2.3 billion in economic benefits each year.

Whether the EU’s rules prove to be an economic cost – as Australia’s effort will almost certainly turn out to be – or a competitive advantage remains to be seen, however the European Parliament is certainly making a case for data security and privacy protection as being an important selling point in a highly competitive digital world.

The competitive advantages between countries and continents in the 21st Century will be vary different to those that determined the economic winners of the previous two centuries.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Saving retirement

The costs of the baby boomer population bubble are becoming apparent

Retirement age is vexed problem in the developed world; while life expectancy has increased over the last Century, the age where one becomes eligible for the pension has barely changed.

Harvard University professor Martin Feldstein illustrates this in a post on Project Syndicate, Saving Retirement, where he has a number of suggestions of moving the pension age to ease the pressures on public finances.

Obviously, retirees deserve advance notice before benefits are reduced. That is why it is important for the US – and for many countries around the world – to act now to make the changes needed to stabilize future pension finances.
Those pressures are going to become more real in the decade as the baby boomers join the ranks of the retired, the cry “I’ve paid my taxes, where’s my benefits?” is going to get louder.
Unfortunately for them, the kitty’s going to turn out to be bare – there simply aren’t enough Generation X and Y workers in the developed economies to pay for millions of boomers collecting pensions for the next thirty years.
Governments around the world have ignored this obvious, and predictable, problem for fifty years and now it’s time to address it. Unfortunately few leaders have the courage to tell their electorates the truth of the challenge ahead.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts

Revisiting the Lipstick effect

How real is the lipstick effect? The Irish experience says it’s complex.

During the recession much was made about the ‘lipstick effect’ – the idea some businesses and products would survive because they’re little luxuries that cash strapped consumers will spend on while scrimping and saving in other areas.

Some of those areas are ladies’ cosmetics (lipstick), chocolate, movies and coffee shops. All of them offering small pleasures for a few dollars.

It’s a theory I’ve always been sceptical of and an episode of the BBC’s World Of Business where Peter Day travels to Cork to see how Ireland’s second city is recovering from the great recession illustrates the reality is a lot more complex than the theory suggests.

“We really struggled to keep alive,” Claire Nash of Nash 19 restaurant says in her interview with Day on her business experience during the recession.

“My turnover just absolutely took a spiralling tumble and it wasn’t that the customer weren’t coming in – those that had lost their jobs weren’t coming in – but those that hadn’t lost their jobs were really hurting and they were very careful with their spend.

“So they started using us as a treat, which was a model I never wanted to enter into but we weathered the storm.”

It can be argued that Claire survived because of the lipstick effect – she kept enough customers to survive – but it was tough and had she taken out the loans offered to her during the boom it’s unlikely her restaurant would have survived.

The key point though is the lipstick effect turned out to be a very different, and much less lucrative business, for Claire and other businesses in Cork.

So assuming a business will remained unscathed because of the assumption the lipstick effect is a big risk, if that’s the plan then Sequoia Capital’s infamous Powerpoint of Doom comes to mind.

While the presentation was aimed at tech companies and investors, it’s a good overview of how the Global Financial Crisis happened and Slide 49 – Survival of the Quickest – is probably the best lesson for any business: Act fast to adapt.

The lipstick theory is a nice way to justify unsustainable business models, particularly those that rely on consumer spending, in the face of a recession but the assumption spending will remain the same as customers will seek little luxuries is deeply flawed.

A business that doesn’t respond quickly to changed circumstances and reduced spending is one that might not survive a downturn.

Peter Day’s Cork story is a good listen on how Ireland and Cork have weathered the global financial crisis, the main question from the piece is how much have the Irish and the rest of the world learned from the mistakes of the boom years at the start of the 21st Century.

Similar posts:

InfoSec’s looming labor shortage

A looming shortage of IT security experts is one example of new jobs being created.

For the last few days I’ve been reading Cisco’s 2014 annual security report and trying to decide exactly which parts are suitable for this site, Networked Globe and the various other outlets I write for.

One of concerns Cisco raises in their study is the labor problem facing the information security (InfoSec) community with a shortage of a million workers this year.

Even when budgets are generous, CISOs (Chief Information Security Officers) struggle to hire people with up-to-date security skills. It’s estimated that by 2014, the industry will still be short more than a million security professionals across the globe. Also in short supply are security professionals with data science skills—understanding and analyzing security data can help improve alignment with business objectives.

“There are essential a million jobs across the globe that can be filled but we don’t have trained people to fill them,” Cisco’s Chief Security Officer John Stewart told a media conference yesterday. “We’ve got a dearth of talent and skills.”

As governments tighten up laws on liability for data breaches and privacy lapses a lot of businesses will be fighting to find people with the right skills to fix their problems or help them manage various technology and security risks.

So if you have a teenager moping around the house wondering what to do for a job, or you’re looking for a career change, becoming an IT security expert might be the answer.

Just as we see many jobs disappear in the face of technological change, we see new ones appear. This is a good example.

Similar posts:

Digital vagrancy

The term digital vagrant might be appropriate for the businesses and people left behind in a connected world.

One of the joys of writing on and analysing trends IT industry trends is the never ending source of buzzwords and phrases that vendors invent.

Today is a good day with a release from security software vendor AVG coining the term ‘Digital Vagrant’.

Underlying the idea of digital vagrancy is an abandoned underclass who, overwhelmed by technology, are ignored and neglected in a connected society. As the AVG media release describes;

Users who are left behind to wander around in an online world that largely ignores them are nothing more than the digital equivalent of vagrants – people who are left to cope in a world that has become too overwhelming.

‘Digital Vagrant’ joins other wonderful ‘digital’ labels; digital immigrant, digital native and digital sharecropper come to mind.

It’s tempting to think that digital vagrancy is what eventually happens to poor exploited digital sharecroppers – those who’ve donated their free labour to help the likes of Mia Freedman, Chris Anderson and Ariana Huffington to build their media empires.

Should that be the case, there’s going to be many digital vagrants.

On more serious note, AVG does have a point in that both individuals and businesses that scorn technology risk being left behind in society that’s becoming increasingly connected.

Society and business are going through a change similar to that of a century ago where the motor car, trucks and tractors radically changed industries and the economy.

Those farmers and businesspeople who stuck with horse drawn equipment slowly became irrelevant and went broke.

A similar process is happening now as a new wave of technology is changing business and society.

The question for all of us is do we want to be left behind in a connected society?

Beggar image courtesy of apujol through sxc.hu

Similar posts: