Tag: economy

Redefining affluence

Are we at the end of the Western world’s era of great prosperity

Finance writer Scott Pape always has an interesting perspective in his regular columns.

This week he talks about Melissa a mother of three who lives in the US state of Georgia who also happens to be Scott’s virtual PA.

Scott hires Melissa because she’s cheap; far cheaper than her competitors in Australia.

For the $8 an hour she earns, she gets no sick pay, no health insurance and no retirement benefits. Unless Melissa has a well paid partner and her work for Scott is just a sideline to help pay the bills, she will work until she drops.

This is the new reality for those in America, Spain, the UK and most of the West. It’s slowly becoming the reality in Australia as well despite the current hubris about the Down Under Economic Miracle.

Melissa’s job as a secretary or PA was safe and comfortable twenty years ago. Today – just like auto workers, shop assistants, accountants and even lawyers – secretaries are having to trade their secure jobs for precarious, and reduced, incomes in the globalised and casualised marketplace.

Scott makes perfectly valid points that individual drive and determination will be important in the globalised economy, but nothing changes the fact that Melissa and millions like her – including ourselves – will not have the living standards of her parents.

While we can talk about billions of Indians and Chinese improving their standard of living the new globalised world, we shouldn’t forget for a moment that living standards are declining for the most of developed world’s middle and working classes.

This decline isn’t totally due to globalisation and was probably going to happen regardless of the rise of China. The West’s prosperity was built upon the post World War II reconstruction and the credit booms of the 1980s and 2000s. Eventually the money – or the credit – had to run out.

How we as a society deal with this will define our nations and communities over the next fifty years. Our governments, business leaders and media commentators are ill prepared for the effects even if they recognise the problem.

Those most deeply affected are the businesses based on the twentieth century model of ever increasing prosperity. As our retailers are finding, this model is running out of steam.

While some expect the newly affluent Chinese and Indians to save their well padded hides, most will find Asian consumption patterns in the 21st Century will be different to US auto workers of the 1950s or English real estate agents of the 1980s.

Even financial planners like Scott are going to find things different – many financial planners thought they could get rich just skimming commissions off their clients’ portfolios which grew with the ever climbing stock and property markets. That model dropped dead in September 2008.

For those of us born and raised during the Western world’s era of great prosperity, we’re going to find we have to work a lot harder and not take affluence for granted.

Melissa and her eight dollar an hour secretarial service is the future and it’s probably Scott’s, yours and mine as well.

Some may say that’s a pessimistic view of the world, but a leaner, harder economy may be the best thing could happen for us as individuals and a society.

Darling Harbour and the peak of consumerism

Sydney’s old docks reflect the changing economy

Sydney’s Darling Harbour was one the centre of the nation’s mercantile economy, from across the country millions of tons of grain, wheat, sugar and other commodities were loaded onto ships and exported to the empire.

Eventually Darling Harbour fell into disuse, the docks became containerised, bulk goods moved to specifically designed loaders and the new breed of cargo ships were often too big to fit under the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

What really sealed Darling Harbour’s fate was Australia moved from being a largely export based agricultural export economy to a service based consumerist economy.

Today Darling Harbour illustrates that change, the docks have become expensive restaurants, hotels and shopping centres. The notorious “hungry mile” of docks is being converted into “Barangaroo” complex of office blocks, apartments and possibly even a casino for “high roller” Chinese gamblers.

Even the cruise liners are going. The 1980s vision of Darling Harbour as a temple to consumerism and property speculation is complete. In this way, Darling Harbour has become a picture of the Australian economy.

Just as Australia’s mercantile era peaked just before The Great Depression of the 1930s – the depression of the 1890s was actually far harder on Australia, particularly Melbourne and Victoria – the consumerist era finished with the Global Financial Crisis of 2008.

It will be interesting to see how Darling Harbour evolves over the next hundred years.

For a glimpse of the final days of the old Darling Harbour, Island Shunters an ABC documentary from 1977 showed the working lives of railway workers in the goods yards on the Western side of the docks. Today those railyards are the Australian office of Google and Fairfax’s headquarters.

Disrupting the markets

Mary Meeker’s All Things D tech industry presentation raises some fascinating points.

Generally it’s not a good idea to have nearly a hundred slides in a presentation, but Mary Meeker’s overviews of the tech industry are so rich in data it’s impossible not to spend a weekend looking over the entire sldieshow.

Last week Mary gave her presentation at the All Things Digital conference and as usual she identified a range of trends and issues in the technology industries.

Smartphone upsides

Still the early days of smartphone adoption, with 6 billion mobile phone subscriptions worldwide but only 954 million smartphones activated.

This adoption is driving mobile revenues with income growing at 153% per year. Although as she shows later, this is not necessarily good news for everybody.

Print media’s continued decline

A constant in Mary’s presentations over recent years the key slide in has been ad spend versus usage across various mediums.

In this year’s version we still print still vastly over represented with 25% of US advertising while TV remains static, although Henry Blodget at Business Insider thinks the tipping point might be arriving for broadcasters.

Online’s thin returns

One of the things that really jumps out is how thin onlie revenues really are. In annual terms services like Pandora and Zynga are making between 6 and 25 dollars per active user over a year.

These tiny revenues indicate the problem content creators have in making money on the web, after the gatekeepers like Pandora or Spotify have taken their cut, there isn’t much left to go around.

Facebook and Google are also encountering problems as users move to mobile where revenues are even smaller than those from desktop users. This is constraining both services’ earnings growth.

Disrupting markets and governments

Mary’s presentation goes on to look at the disruption web and mobile technologies are bringing to various markets – it’s a good overview of whats changing right now and the products driving the changes.

It’s not just markets that are being disrupted with Mary also looking the US’s budget position and entitlement culture. This in itself is a massive driver of change which will have a deep effect on our lives regardless of where we live.

Are we in a bubble?

Mary finishes up with a look at whether we’re in a tech bubble or not.

Her view is that we are and we aren’t – there are silly valuations of companies in the private market however the poor performance of tech stocks on the stock market indicate the public aren’t being fooled.

One telling statistic is the only 2% of companies have accounted for nearly all the wealth creation of the 1,720 US tech IPOs between 1980 and 2002. There’s little to indicate much has changed in the decade since.

The optimism in funding new businesses is based in the disruption they are bringing to markets and industries – you only need one eBay or Google in your portfolio and you’re a legend, if not filthy rich.

Both the economic and technological changes are disrupting our own businesses and this is why its worth reading and understanding Mary Meeker’s presentations if only to be prepared for the inevitable changes.

Falling Dominos, Fading Businesses

The effects of business failure can be great and personal.

“When the tide goes out, we find out who’s naked” goes the saying – nowhere is this more true than in the engineering and construction industries.

One of the hallmarks of an economy that has passed its peak is the systemic failure of contracting companies.

During a boom, or a steady growth phase of an economy, contracting companies see cashflows increase as more projects come online.

That growth affects contractors in a number of ways – they start getting used to fatter margins and management starts to believe in their own invulnerability.

Blue sky seems to stretch on forever and massive growth rates seem guaranteed far into the future.

As the market matures the sky starts to turn grey as more contractors start fighting for lucrative jobs seeing cost estimates being fudged and dodgy deals done to win jobs.

Those dodgy contracts eventually come in at a loss and management starts desperately winning more projects to cover the losses on earlier work.

And so a spiral begins.

To make matters worse, the more aggressive contractors start buying out smaller competitors.

Often those competitors have similar bad projects on their books and their impressive growth rates are based upon winning jobs they should never have tendered for.

Eventually the spiral ends when the market stalls and there aren’t enough new projects available for the loss making contractors to cover the accumulated losses. Then the failures begin.

Collapses of the Hasties Group, Reed, St Hilliers and other construction and engineering contractors are classic examples of this cycle.

While shareholders and management carry some of the burden, the real pain of failure is felt by the armies of sub-contractors – largely small, family owned businesses – these companies employ.

Most of these subcontractors will not get paid for their outstanding invoices, forcing all of them to cut back their own employment and spending. For some, they will be forced into liquidation as they can’t pay their own bills.

For the families that own those small businesses the financial and emotional pain is real and immediate. Spending stops, debts go unpaid and relationships fail.

In some cases that small bankrupt plumber, bricklayer or concreter finds the stresses of failure too great and a family loses their breadwinner.

This multiplier effect of business failures and redundancies is one of the reasons the real economy is in a much tighter position than Australia’s political, business and media elites can bear to admit.

Another saying is “a recession is when your neighbour loses their job, a depression is when you lose yours.” For most families, the economy has been in recession for three years as they’ve seen friends and relatives accept reduced hours or have contracts terminated.

Much of the commentary about Australians being irrationally pessimistic misses this aspect of our economy. It’s amusing when the smug comments come from financial and economic journalists who don’t seem to have noticed the difficulties their own industry going through.

There’s a lot of naked people treading water at the moment and the tide is heading out. The question for all of is where the deep water is and where the hell did we leave our speedos.

Could Australia follow the Greek path?

Is Australia really different from Greece?

Business Spectator’s Robert Gottliebsen today describes how Australia has caught the Greek disease of low productivity and an overvalued currency.

This is interesting as just last week Robert was bleating on behalf of Australia’s middle class welfare state.

Australia’s productivity has stagnated over the last 15 years, but unlike Greece the ten years before that was a period of massive reform to both employment practices and government spending.

The structure of the Australian economy is very different, not least in its openness, to that of Greece.

What’s more Australia has a floating currency which will eventually correct itself unlike the Euro that Greece finds itself trapped in.

That’s not to say Australians won’t be hurt when that currency correction happens. The failure of the nation’s political, business and media elites in failing to recognise and plan for this is an indictment on all of them – including Robert Gottliebsen.

Australia’s real similarity with Greece is the entitlement culture that both nations have developed.

Over those last 15 years of poor productivity growth, Australia has seen a massive explosion of middle class welfare under the Howard Liberal government which has been institutionalised by the subsequent Rudd and Gillard Labor governments.

Today middle class Australians believe they have a right to generous government benefits subsidising their superannuation, school fees and self funded retirements.

For all the sneering of Australian triumphalists about Greek hairdressers getting lavish government benefits, Australia isn’t far behind Greece in believing these entitlements are a birthright.

A middle class entitlement culture is the real similarity between Australia and Greece. It’s unsustainable in every country that harbours these illusions.

Unlike Greece, Australia doesn’t have sugar daddies in Brussels, Paris and Berlin desperate to prop up the illusion of the European Union. Australia is own its own when the consequences of magic pudding economics become apparent.

Australia’s day of reckoning may arrive much quicker than that of Greece. Then we’ll see the test of how Australians and their politicians are different from our Greek friends.

Customer service gods

After years of neglect, customer service now matters again.

“Treat your customer service people like gods,” says online business advisor Todd Alexander.

One of the conceits of the 1980s business model was that customer service, like training and capital investment, is an expense that should be driven down at all costs.

In corporations, government departments and politics those who dealt directly with the customers, taxpayers or voters were seen to be the low level, low status employees who could be outsourced at the first possible opportunity.

That was great when markets were growing and there was an abundance of low hanging fruit to be plucked from the marketplace.

Now that customers are cash strapped and margins are falling, keeping customers happy becomes more important.

A statistic often quoted is that acquiring a new customer costs five times more than keeping an existing one, that difference may be exaggerated but it’s not far from the truth.

Those departing customers can do great damage to the business as well.

In the 1980s customers had little recourse apart from taking their business elsewhere. Often they didn’t have that choice in sectors where duopolies reign.

Now customers can vent their frustrations to the world on the web or through social media and there’s no hiding from the loss of reputation.

What’s more, many of the businesses that relied upon picking the low hanging fruit of a growing economy, high immigration or increasing consumer debt to find more customers through the last thirty years now find the rules of changed.

Customer service now matters.

Any management that considers customer service to be low status is a dinosaur and will soon be following them.

It’s a good time to be disrupting comfortable business models.

Reading the global tea leaves

What can we learn about the global economy from the world’s biggest corporation.

Where is the world economy heading? An interesting exercise by the website Business Insider looks at the earnings reports and announcements by some of the world’s biggest corporations to get an idea of the the direction of the global business world.

The results of Business Insider’s article are interesting and worthwhile of a closer look as we can see some real trends along with some risky bets by management who seem reluctant to acknowledge we’ve moved out of the 1980s.

China’s western water shortage

This is an interesting curve ball; one of the central planks of the China Cargo Cult that believes unfettered Chines growth will drive the world economy indefinitely is that the country’s inland provinces will grow in a similar pattern to that of the coastal provinces.

Anyone who has travelled in those provinces, particularly in the poorer Northern regions like Gansu, has seen first hand the serious erosion, desertification and water problems these areas face.

It shows the China story is not as simple as many of the cargo cultists believe.

Europe is not dead

Even in the darkest days there are opportunities for innovative organisations and regardless of what we think of McDonald’s products, they aren’t afraid to experiment and take risks.

McDonald’s move to “value meals” in Europe replicates what worked in the United States in both the 2001 and 2008 economic downturns. This appears to be working in Europe just as it did in North America.

We should also keep in mind that Europe is a diverse collection of cultures and economies so despair in Athens doesn’t necessarily mean pessimism in Arnhem.

The bottom of the US housing market

In his investor briefing, JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon indicated the bank thought the US housing market is at the bottom subject to the American economy not going back into recession.

While it’s possible that the US housing market has bottomed, it’s highly unlikely we’re going to see the US housing market roar back to 2005 levels even if there is a US recovery so we shouldn’t be expecting hockey stick style growth in the US domestic sector driving the world economy as it did through the early 2000s.

Louis Vuitton confirms that the global market for ultra luxury goods is healthy

The entire luxury goods boom is a side effect of the massive amount of money pumped into to the world economy to deal with the 2008 economic crisis.

Like Macao casinos and Silicon Valley venture capital bubbles, this is transitory and at best a marginal influence on overall growth and employment.

It’s interesting how many presentations I’ve seen recently citing the luxury goods markets as evidence all is good in the world economy. This shows the desperation of those whose businesses rely on mindless consumerism.

China’s middle class will save us all

If you were searching for a corporate example of the economic cargo cult surrounding China, then Yum Foods would be one of the best.

The idea that China’s “consuming classes” will number half the nation’s population is some sort of economic Lake Wobegon, where everybody is above average.

Even if Yum’s prediction proves to be true, the nature of China’s economy and the nation’s stage of growth means consumption patterns of the country’s middle – or “consuming” – classes are going to more like those of Americans in 1912 rather than 2002 which undermines any business model based upon the late 20th Century’s profligate spending.

Businesses are once again investing in IT

Microsoft suprised us all last week with their profit results. Earnings from Windows, servers and office suites were all up on improved personal computer sales.

That businesses are investing in IT makes sense as one of the things that is cut early by organisations looking for savings is IT. That happened in 2009 in response to the economic crisis.

Even before the 2009 financial shock, businesses had been under-investing in IT partly because of Microsoft’s failure with the Vista operating system.

Now many businesses have decade old desktop computing systems and the pressures to upgrade are becoming intense.

The worry for Microsoft is Apple’s domination of mobile devices and the rise of cloud computing means that its not necessarily Microsoft will benefit from most of the IT investment.

Electricity prices will rise and low natural gas prices are unsustainable

Energy prices are a riddle within an enigma, however there’s certainly some distorting effects in these markets. CSX’s views on natural gas markets illustrate this.

We can expect more convulsions in energy prices as demand hinges on China, the US and European economic growth coupled with the threat of more conflict in Iran and Iraq.

Should China deliver the growth that the cargo cultists believe then energy prices will continue to climb, which may happen anyway.

The end of the telephone

Again Business Insider’s headline is a little misleading, as Verizon see the decline of the POTS – Plain Old Telephone System – networks that were designed around voice data and a switch to data based networks that don’t treat all traffic as information packets.

Data matters more than voice and we don’t want to be tied to a phone line.

That the telcos see mobile data as their main revenue drivers shouldn’t be a surprise as this has been the trend for two decades.

Consumers are borrowing again

This claim is a worry as it indicates some consumers – along with many lenders – are falling into the habits that nearly bought them unstuck in 2008.

A superficial view of the Amex announcement actually raises more questions than it answers and there’s a suspicion that the credit card provider is driving growth through special offers or reforming their excessive merchant charges.

Like JP Morgan, much of Amex’s optimism is based upon the US economy moving out of recession and American consumers resuming their credit binge. The latter may prove to be a bridge too far.

Winning in diverse European markets

Like McDonald’s, IBM sees plenty of opportunity in Europe and makes the point that, like Asia, the European markets are diverse.

IBM may turn out to be a more of a beneficiary of the increased IT spending that Microsoft is relying upon as Big Blue’s consulting services and cloud technologies are more attuned with where the enterprise computing market is going.

Also in an era of government austerity, IBM may be able to offer process savings to cash strapped agencies and authorities.

Asian consumers save the cigarette industry

There’s no doubt East Asian societies like a smoke so the idea that international tobacco brands see great opportunities in markets like South Korea, the Philippines and Indonesia shouldn’t be a surprise.

Interestingly China doesn’t feature in these projections as their market is largely closed to foreign manufacturers.

While the short term looks good for tobacco companies in East Asia, it’s difficult not to see that rising affluence starts to see public health and anti smoking campaigns similar to those in the West developing over the longer term.

Yahoo parties like it’s 1999

Web surfers want relevant content according to Yahoo’s management. Next month we’ll see these business giants claim social networks and cloud computing are the next big thing.

You can’t help but thing Yahoo’s management are very well qualified to tell us when horses have bolted and vanished over the horizon.

The problem for Yahoo is that customised content is expensive unless you’re going to “crowdsource” it with a social layer as Facebook does and Google is trying to do.

If Yahoo can pull something like this off – and there is no indication they can – then the business has a chance of surviving. Right now the smart money would be betting on the being broken up in the near future.

So where is the world economy going?

One unsurprising thing from these corporate projection is that some businesses are better prepared than others for the changes that are happening.

IBM and McDonald’s stand out as those prepared to innovate and change their business models to suit the prevailing situations.

Companies that believe the 1980s are just around the corner again seem to be the ones most vulnerable – its not surprising that its finance organisations like JP Morgan and Amex are betting the farm on continued massive growth in consumer debt.

The China Cargo Cultist are also vulnerable. If it turns out that Chinese growth – like US consumer spending in the 1980s – can’t go on forever then companies like Yum Foods are going to struggle with growth rates far lower than they expect.

One thing is clear, that there are a lot more nuances in the world’s economy that what you’d pick up from media headlines. The key for big and small entrepreneurs is figure out where these nuances present a business opportunity.

Black tea image courtesy of Zsuzsanna Kilian and SXC storck photos.

Taking care of our own

Our governments can’t fix every problem or address our every need. We need to take matters into our own hands.

“The council ought to do something” growled a friend who’d been stuck in a peak hour traffic jam.

That innocuous comment illustrates the fundamental challenge facing the developed world’s politicians – that we expect our governments to fix every problem we encounter.

In the case of the local traffic jam, the cars creating gridlock are parents driving their children to two nearby large private schools.

Despite the problem being caused by the choices of individuals – those decisions to send their kids to those schools and to drive them there – our modern mindset is “the government aught to do something” rather than suggesting people should be making other choices.

Socialising the costs of our private decisions is one of the core beliefs of the 1980s mindset.

Eventually though the money had to run out as we started to expect governments to solve every problem.

We’re seeing the effects of this in the United States where local governments are now having pull up black top roads, close schools and renege on retirement funds as those costs become too great.

As a society we have to accept there are limits to what governments can do for us.

Increasingly as the world economy deleverages, tax revenues fall and the truth that a benign government can’t fulfill our every need starts to dawn on the populace, we’ll realise that expecting politicians and public servants to save us is a vain hope as they simply don’t have the resources.

Bruce Springsteen puts this well in his song “We Take Care Of Our Own.”

The truth today is the cargo cult mentality of waiting for governments or cashed up foreigners to come and save us is over.

We’re going to have to rely more on our own businesses, families and communities to support us in times of need.

The existing institutions of the corporate welfare state are beginning to collapse under the weight of their own contradictions.

Joe Hockey knows this, but as a paid-up agent of the establishment he doesn’t dare nominate the massive cuts to middle class welfare and big business subsidies that are necessary to reform those institutions.

Waiting for the council to fix the local roundabout is nice but it doesn’t address the bigger problems.

It’s up to us to build the new institutions around our local communities and families. This is not a bad thing.

Is small business too pessimistic?

The small business sector doesn’t seem to be too confident about the future.

The MYOB March 2012 Business Monitor report is a disturbing document; not only does it show how low confidence is among Australian business owners, it also portrays a group that are making sacrifices for an uncertain future. Is this what small business has come to?

One of the most disturbing aspects of the survey is how long company founders go without a break. With one third reporting they had not taken holidays since starting their business, this statistic is constant regardless of how long the operation has been going.

As somebody who went a decade without taking a holiday, I have a lot of sympathy for business owners in that situation.

What really jumps out is the pessimism of business owners – a quarter don’t expect the economy to improve for at least two years and only 39% expect their revenues to rise.

That business owners would be so negative about the future is disturbing; they should be the most optimistic.

It’s also interesting that more than half are disappointed with levels of support from the government, does anyone expect different?

Quite frankly, if you want money or support from the government then get a job with the public service. I tried that for a few months and there’s plenty of pessimistic people there.

That small business owners are becoming as disillusioned as public servants is a concern for our economy and society. Hopefully it’s not a permanent condition.

What if Bill Gates had been born in Australia?

Can a society that puts property speculation before innovation succeed in the 21st Century?

Microsoft founder Bill Gates is today one of the world’s biggest philanthropists having built his business from an obscure traffic management software company to what was at one stage the world’s biggest technology corporation.

But what if he’d been born in Sutherland, New South Wales rather than Seattle, Washington? How different would things have been for an Australian Bill Gates?

The first thing is he would have been encouraged to study law; just like his dad. In the 1970s lawyers had far more status and career prospects than software developers in Australia.

Causing more concern for his parents and career counselor would have been his determination to run his own business. It’s far safer to get a safe job, buy a house then start buying investment properties to fund your retirement.

The Funding Drought

If Bill still persisted with his ideas, he’d have hit a funding problem. No bank wouldn’t be interested in lending and his other alternatives would restricted.

In the Australia of the 1970s and 80s they’d be few alternatives for a business like Micro Soft. Even today, getting funding from angel groups and venture capital funds depend upon luck and connections rather than viable business ideas.

Bill Gates’ big break came when IBM knocked on his door to solve their problem of finding a personal computer operating system; the likelihood of any Australian company seeking help from a small operator – let alone one run by a a couple of twenty somethings – is so unlikely even today it’s difficult to comprehend that happening.

Eventually an antipodean Bill Gates would have probably admitted defeat, wound up his business and gone to work for dad’s law firm.

Invest in property, young man

Over time a smart, hard working young lawyer like Bill would have done well and today he’d be the partner of a big law firm with a dozen investment properties – although some of the coastal holiday properties wouldn’t be going well.

While some things have changed in the last thirty years – funding is a little easier to find in the current angel and venture capital mania – most Australians couldn’t think about following in Bill Gates’ path.

Part of the reason is conservatism but a much more important reason are our taxation and social security systems.

Favoring property speculators over entrepreneurs

Under our government policies an inventor, innovator or entrepreneur is penalised for taking risks. The ATO starts with the assumption all small or new businesses are tax dodges while ASIC is a thinly disguised small business tax agency and assets tests punish anyone with the temerity to consider building an business rather than buying investment properties.

At the same time a wage earner is allowed to offset losses made in property or shares against their income taxes, something that those building the businesses or inventing the tools of the future are expressly forbidden from doing.

Coupled with exemptions on taxing the capital gains on homes, Australian households – and society – is vastly over invested in property.

Making matters worse, the ramping up of property prices over the last thirty years has allowed generations of Australians to believe that property is risk free and doubles in value every decade.

That perception is reinforced by banks reluctant to lend to anyone who doesn’t have real estate equity to secure their loans.

So we have a society that favours property speculation over invention and innovation.

Every year in the run up to Federal budget time tax reform becomes an issue, the real effects of negative gearing and other subsidies for housing speculation – the distortion of our economy and societies investment attitudes – are never discussed.

In Australia there are thousands of smart young kids today who could be the Bill Gates’ of the 21st Century.

The question is do we want to encourage them to lead their generation or steer them towards a safe job and an investment property just like grandpa?

Common interests

A successful business partnership relies upon respecting each party

KFC is booming in the world’s emerging markets. From Shanghai, China to Accra, Ghana, crowds are lining up to eat and the fast food chain is opening new outlets across the world.

Yet in KFC’s home market, the United States, the chain is shutting outlets and infuriating franchisees.

A Bloomberg BusinessWeek profile looks at the success of Yum! foods, KFC’s parent company, and the contradiction of overseas success while their domestic business fades.

One thing is absolutely clear, Yum Food’s vainglorious Chief Executive David Novak and his board have made a clear decision to focus on expanding the core business of deep fried chicken in emerging markets while making little effort to adapt to changes in their domestic operations.

At least Yum are keeping their US based KFC operations, many of their other brands are being sold off as the company responds to changes US tastes and economic circumstances.

For the US KFC franchisees, this is a difficult process as their interests are not the same as those of Yum’s management.

At the heart of every business agreement are people acting in their own interests. The most successful partnerships are those where everybody’s interests are recognised and respected.

In their US operations, the big question is how long Yum can neglect their US franchisees and markets without affecting their international operations.

For Yum’s international operations it’s going to be fascinating to see how the partnerships and joint ventures underpinning their expansion in emerging market evolve.

Yum will probably find in some of these markets that their local partners don’t share their interests. Then they may find themselves in the same position of their US franchisees.

Overselling technology

Do technologists promise too much?

“We’d like to allow remote band members – say a violinist in the Australian outback – be able to participate in an orchestra as if they were there. We hope the NBN will be able to do this.”

When the band organiser said this at a business roundtable all the technologists, myself included, choked.

There are many things the Australian National Broadband Network will deliver but the ability to teleport a violinist from the outback to downtown Sydney or Melbourne isn’t one of them.

One of the problems with technology is we tend to oversell the immediate effects; as Bill Gates famously said “The impact of all new technologies is overestimated in the short term but under estimated in the long term.”

Because we tend to sell the immediate sizzle, customers are disappointed when our promises don’t eventuate. In the decade it takes to win them back, those initial benefits we didn’t deliver in six months have become commonplace.

This is probably one of the reasons why businesses are reluctant to invest in new technology or online services; they’ve heard the promises before and they don’t trust what they can hear.

In the late 1990s businesses spent tens of thousands – sometimes millions – establishing websites that didn’t work. Those financial scars still hurt when they hear talk, some of them are still paying off those sites. So it’s barely surprising they are reluctant to return to a sector that has now matured.

Perhaps it’s best to underpromise; instead of cloud computer vendors committing themselves to 80% savings and social media experts promising millions of customers from their new viral video, it may be better to be more realistic with the expectations.

Customers have become deaf to wonderful promises, they are expecting us to deliver. Promising the world is no longer a business strategy.