Category: future

Last week in Sydney the Federal government’s Online Retail Forum, set up after the first round of big-retailer complaints about Internet shopping, was held to discuss the threats and opportunities that lie in the connected economy.

The event’s location and timing, being held at the old Sydney Post Office the day after the Angus & Robertson book chain went into administration, was somewhat symbolic of the changes facing the retail industry.

Australia Post itself is a good example of a business dealing with change, their traditional mail business is shrinking while the move to online commerce is driving and growing their parcels business. As traditional post offices selling stamps become less important, new opportunities open in the logistics of getting physical goods to Internet shoppers.

The old post office itself is an example of that, as technology changed how mail is sorted and delivered the need for a big downtown building disappeared and today the mail service occupies a tiny corner of the massive building which is now a hotel and office complex.

How post offices changed is a big lesson for commercial landlords, and our super funds that invest in them. COSBOA’s Peter Strong pointed out on the opening panel how the business model of ever increasing rents forcing out smaller retailers and replacing them with cookie cutter national chains and franchises is one that is already struggling to cater for the online consumer.

Customer service is the opportunity missed by the big ‘bricks and mortar’ retailers, a physical store has the advantage of being able to deliver a personalised, friendly experience yet what we find when we visit a big department store or electronics ‘category killer’ superstore is service that often leaves much to be desired.

The participants of the online retail forum’s panels covered how the online retail industry is filling the customer service void; Mike Knapp, the co-founder of Sdyney’s Shoes of Prey, explained how their consumer friendly return policies encourage sales while logistics companies like DHL, Temando and Australia Post described how tracking the delivery of Internet purchases was essential for customer confidence.

Most importantly, much of the morning emphasised that e-commerce was only a small part of what the Internet has to offer the retail industry. The web has become a monitoring tool for both buyers and sellers as well as improving the supply chain and radically changing the marketing industry.

Google’s Jason Pellegrino explained how many of the US electronics chain Best Buy stores now keeps floor stock for consumers to feel and touch but then places orders through the net for delivery to the buyer’s premises. Not keeping anything more than display stock dramatically improved the efficiency of Best Buy’s stores.

Interestingly Dick Smith Electronics employs the opposite model, with their “click and collect” service customers can order online and nominate the store they want to pick up the product which gives the retailer an opportunity to cross or up sell.

Both models illustrate how retail can adapt and take advantage of shoppers using the Internet and with some creative thinking can open up new opportunities which enhance their traditional sales models.

The message from all the industry panellists at the retail forum was consistent; the net is giving power back to the consumer who is using it. For retailers to compete, they have to be dirt cheap or offer excellent customer service.

What the event showed is the customer is more important than the technology – the point of going online is about improving the offer to customers be it by cheaper prices, faster delivery or better service. If the technology happens to improve our margins then that’s a pleasant benefit as well.

Customer service is something our bigger corporations like the retail giants, banks and telcos have forgotten, it’s now turning around to bite them and that’s probably the biggest opportunity for the rest of us – to adapt technology to our business in ways that deliver a better product.

It’s more than just having a website and online shopping cart, these changes are affecting almost every business. It’s important we all think about how our ventures are going to adapt to markets where our customers have more power than ever.

Similar posts:

• No Related Posts

Across the world industries are in turmoil as the Internet and globalisation allow new competitors into once safe markets. How do the incumbents deal with the upstarts and how do innovators challenge the establishment?

One way is to redefine the market, instead of taking on the incumbent or challenger on their own terms, aim the product at a segment that hasn’t been properly developed. The best example of this is Apple’s iPod.

When the iPod was released there were hundreds of MP3 players on the market including those from Sony who were expected to continue their dominance in the personal entertainment device market which they had developed around the Sony Walkman in the early 1980s.

Apple took that market and redefined it on their terms, they then repeated the strategy with both the iPhone and the iPad.

While not every business will have Apple’s design talent, or the market opportunities that allowed Apple to time their entry with those products, their experience shows how choosing where you fight your market battles matters.

In the United States, major airlines are deciding not to compete with cut price carriers on travel websites, the reasoning being that these online comparison services only compare products on price which is not the legacy carriers’ advantage. Instead airlines like American and Delta are pushing their own websites that emphasise their advantages such as free baggage allowances, lounges, inflight meals or downtown check-in facilities that their low cost competitors don’t offer.

Qantas in Australia carried out a similar strategy when faced with low cost carriers entering their market. They set up Jetstar as a low cost carrier which started flying the price sensitive routes, mainly the leisure and holiday services, leaving the expensive full service legacy operations to focus on the business dominated routes that weren’t so concerned about price.

In doing this, Qantas chose where they were going to fight and on what terms, which has helped them remain profitable at a time when many other legacy airlines have struggled.

Traditional retailers are facing a similar problem to the airline industry as online stores are taking growing share of the shopping market. Some commentators are suggesting they need to compete with online services, but for many entering a field where someone else has the advantage would be a mistake.

Instead it may be better to choose where a business’s existing strengths lie and build upon those. For a bricks and mortar retail store, this may mean service and convenience.

A good example of this is the cornerstore of our grandparents days. With the rise of supermarkets, most of these smaller shops went out of business as they tried to compete with the better range, prices and convenience of the self service stores. We saw a similar process happen with speciality shops like butchers and greengrocers.

In recent times we’ve seen the corner store being reborn as retailers have discovered that consumers are prepared to pay more than supermarket prices in return for convenience. The modern convenience store is different to the corner shop of our grandparents’ days, but it is a recognisable descendant which caters to the changed society and customer needs.

This changing society and evolving customer demands is what today’s retailers, and every other industry, needs to consider as they look at the future of their business. The economy is going through a period of massive change and disruption.

Building on strengths and recognising other’s advantages and weaknesses is the key to survival in such an environment. For a traditional, bricks-and-mortar appliance store, an e-commerce solution might be the answer as could a social media strategy or offering bid discounts to Internet shoppers.

The key is to choose the marketplace where your business have the strengths, either by redefining markets as Apple often do or by focusing on key advantages like Qantas and the US airlines are trying to do.

A similar rule applies when challenging the incumbents in the marketplace, in fields where barriers are low and it’s difficult to simply undercut the established players, you have choose the areas in which they are weak and the demand is strong.

This isn’t to say incumbents shouldn’t adopt new technologies, they should and they can use them to build on areas they are strong while looking at how new methods can fix their weaknesses. Similarly upstarts can compete in an incumbent’s core market if the existing players are weak or aren’t adapting to changing conditions.

Choosing the battlefield is the key, whether you’re an incumbent protecting your market position or an upstart looking at building a new market, working from a position of strength makes success far more likely.

Similar posts:

• No Related Posts