Category: Internet

  • Taxing the Internet laggards

    Taxing the Internet laggards

    Online retailer Ruslan Kogan is never short of a good stunt to promote his business. His latest, a tax on users of Internet Explorer 7 has given him worldwide attention.

    Ruslan touches on a real problem for web designers, e-commerce shopkeepers and the online community in general – that Microsoft’s older versions of their Internet Explorer web browsers don’t conform with standards.

    This means IE6 and 7 don’t display pages the way other browsers do meaning designers have to spend extra time catering for the people who won’t move to new versions.

    For those who insist on using the older versions of Internet Explorer, they are also taking a risk as these products are far less secure than the newer editions.

    It’s in everybody’s interests to have the latest browsers and security patches, so both Windows and Mac users should be making sure they have the latest updates on their computers.

    Even with the latest updates, it’s worthwhile using a different web browser to the one that comes with the system. That’s why Opera, Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome are the better options for web browsers.

    Ruslan Kogan’s right in forcing users to move onto modern software, it’s a media stunt that might do some good.

    Similar posts:

  • Building the Internet’s Frankenstein monsters

    Building the Internet’s Frankenstein monsters

    Apple’s announcement of deep Facebook integration into their iOS6 operating system for the iPhone and iPad is the latest in the weird beasts created as the various online empires jostle for position in a changing marketplace.

    We’re used to failing companies creating alliances – most notably Microsoft and Nokia in the mobile phone sector – and almost all of these ventures fail as they are akin to the two slowest runners in a race tying their legs together believing that will make them faster than the leader.

    In other areas we see the big players buy out hot new businesses as the incumbents figure its easier to buy out the competition rather than try to compete.

    While those purchases form the basis of the Silicon Valley greater fool model, usually the new business gets subsumed into the big corporation, the technology is lost and all but the most cynical founders wander off to do something more interesting.

    Then there’s the merger of equals, and today’s announcement of Apple and Facebook’s deep co-operation is one of these.

    Facebook has been talking about building its own phone – much to the scorn of industry participants – as the company struggles to deal with user moving onto mobile phones.

    Apple is hopeless at social media, which is barely surprising from a company that employs its own secret police.

    So the two coming together make sense although it may not work well as alliances like these can be likened like mating the world’s best golfer with a Grand Slam Tennis champion and expecting the child to be an Olympic swimmer.

    Of course Apple had a successful merger of equals back in the early days of the iPhone – Google. The alliance worked well and, Google’s then CEO Eric Schmidt sat on Apple’s board for some time.

    Than Google decided to develop its own mobile software build its own phones so relationships soured between Steve Jobs and Eric.

    Now Google Maps has been ditched from the iOS phone system and steadily Google are finding their services being dropped from all of Apple’s products.

    Those moveable alliances – not dissimilar to Eurasia, Eastasia and Oceania in George Orwell’s 1984 – are something we should get used to as the Big Four maneuver for position in the changing online world.

    While it’s going to be tough time if you’re a mindless fanboi following the progeny of these strange alliances, for the rest of us it should be fascinating viewing.

    Similar posts:

  • Continuing the online payments battle

    Continuing the online payments battle

    Today Mastercard announced their PayPass service, a “digital wallet” that allows consumers to pay through various online channels including the web and their smartphones.

    Mastercard’s PayPass is the latest move in the battle to control the online payments industry as consumers move from plastic cards to using their mobile phones and Internet devices.

    One of the interesting aspects of PayPass is how it is a direct challenge to PayPal who in turn recently launched their PayPal Here service which threatens incumbent credit card services like Mastercard and Visa along with upstarts like Square.

    While its early days yet in the mobile payments space as consumers slowly begin to accept using smartphones and tablet computers to pay for goods and services, its clear the industry incumbents are moving to secure their positions in the market place.

    It’s going to be interesting to see how this develops, many merchants will be hoping this competition starts to drive down transaction costs.

    Similar posts:

  • Is the Paperless Office promise about to come true?

    Is the Paperless Office promise about to come true?

    For as long as personal computers have been around the paperless office one of the holy grails of the IT industry.

    Paper is messy, difficult to file or store and cruel to the environment. So being able to move and save information electronically made sense.

    Despite the promises of the last twenty years, the quest for the paperless office seemed lost.

    While the networked PC gave us the ability to get rid of paper, its advanced word processing functions and graphic capabilities along with the data explosion of email tempted us into generating more paper.

    To compound the problem, over the last thirty years paper manufacturers found cheaper ways to make their product which meant the price of paper dropped dramatically just as we found more ways to use it.

    So rather than delivering on the promise of eliminating paper, computers generated more than ever before.

    Just as it seemed all was lost in IT’s War On Paper, the tablet computer came along. Coupled with cloud computing services and accessible fast wireless Internet, suddenly it appears we might just be on the verge on delivering on those promises of the last twenty years.

    At a suburban football game I saw this first hand as I watched the ground officials electronically filing match information with their league.

    “This used to be a pile of paperwork that used to take until Tuesday to be filed and collated” the ground manager told me, “today it’s done within half an hour of the game ending with almost no paper involved.”

    For amateur sports clubs, money isn’t so much the problem as time. There simply are never enough volunteers to meet the workload of getting a team on field.

    This is true with almost any community based organisation – from volunteer firefighters to community kindergartens organisers struggle with rosters and finding helpers.

    In business the same resource constraints exist except we know we can fix these problems by paying a worker to do it. The problem there is few businesses have unlimited funds to employ filing clerks and form fillers to handle the paperwork.

    By killing paper in the office, we’re making business and the economy more efficient. We’re about to deliver on that promise.

    Bill Gates once wrote that in the short term we overpromise what technology can deliver while in the long term we underestimate its effects.

    This is true of the paperless office – now that promise is being delivered the effects on business and government will be profound.

    Is your business prepared for these changes?

    Similar posts:

  • Risks and opportunities in crowdsourcing

    Risks and opportunities in crowdsourcing

    Crowdsourcing and offshoring are changing bringing to small business the same changes we’ve seen in manufacturing and low level office jobs over the last forty years.

    Those trends are going to affect local businesses – particularly the home based service providers – in a serious way as the local web designer and bookkeeper find themselves undercut by freelancers in countries where an Australian day rate is a month’s pay.

    With those thoughts in mind I went along to a round table discussion with crowdsourcing advocate Ross Dawson, Freelancer CEO Matt Barrie and Design Crowd founder Alec Lynch to hear them discuss some of the issues around the concept ahead of their half day workshops in Sydney later this months.

    Having read Ross’ recent book, Getting Results From Crowds, many of the concepts and arguments are familiar but its worthwhile considering how the trend of a globalised workforce is changing.

    The benefits of crowdsourcing services

    Crowdsourcing services like Design Crowd and Freelancer have benefits traditional outsourcing services don’t have.

    Alec Lynch describes these as reduced expense, speed and risk. A broad range of cheap, accessible suppliers mean businesses aren’t locked into costly contracts with the attendant risks while they can bring projects to fruition in days.

    Until recently, globalisation only bought benefits for major corporations with manufacturers contracting work out to China, back office functions to India and software development to Eastern Europe.

    The rise of web based services where smaller, one off projects could be paid for by credit card has bought global outsourcing into the small and medium sized business markets.

    Now local businesses are affected by business practices that, until recently, were the concern of those working for large organisations.

    This is bad news for local service businesses; the suburban web designer or bookkeeper is now finding themselves competing with individuals who, as Matt Barrie points out, have a very good weeks’ income for the equivalent of a day’s pay in Australia.

    Basically the same forces that drove most low value manufacturing offshore are now driving services and white collar jobs the same way.

    Responding to the threat

    There are major downsides for clients using these project based outsourcing services; for instance designing a logo is only part of a much bigger branding exercise which in turn has to be considered against the orgainisation’s longer term objectives.

    Often, most of us don’t know what we don’t know and that’s the real reason why we hire an expert to explain why a logo should look a certain way, an expense should be allocated to one specific cost centre and not another or why we should one software package over another.

    When we outsource our services, particularly to a low cost provider, we lose that expert insight and end up with someone just carrying out a task; it is up to us to supervise something we probably don’t understand ourselves.

    Part of that supervisory role is project management, in the design field managing creatives can be like herding cats. This is why experienced project managers are worth their weight in gold.

    Like many essential skills, project management is one of those which most of us don’t have and is chronically undervalued but when a business is outsourcing to a freelancer in Estonia or Eritrea then this service is essential.

    Providing those skilled supervisor and management roles is where the opportunities lie in a crowdsourced market place.

    In many ways, we’re seeing the end result of the post-industrial society. Just as we offshored the manufacturing industries through the 1970s and 80s then the low skilled office work in the 1990s and 2000s, we’re now outsourcing local services to low cost countries.

    Whether ultimately this is a good thing or not is a big question but for local businesses, the trend is clear and much of the basic work is going offshore. Those who choose to whinge rather than adapt will be left behind.

    Similar posts: