Death of the cashback scheme

I’m no fan of cashback schemes. Having dealt with them on behalf of customers in my old IT support business, I’ve seen too many people messed around by them.

So the news that the Officeworks chain will stop offering them is welcome and hopefully will see the industry move away from these often unethical and unfair practices.

The main reason for offering cashback schemes is to keep commisions up for salespeople. If a TV or laptop vendor simply cut prices by $200 they would find the salespeople steering customers to more expensive competitors.

So it’s no surprise to see which stores aren’t following Officework’s lead.

If you are offered a cashback, ignore it while negotiating a price as it’s none of the store’s business what you do with it and most certainly won’t help you if there’s a problem down the track. Treat any cashbacks as a bonus and don’t factor it into your purchase.

Or better still, avoid electronics stores staffed by commission driven sharks.

Addicted

You know you’re addicted to the Internet when you’re having a root canal drilled and you think “I wish I could use my iPhone”.

dentist

You know you’re addicted to the Internet when you’re having a root canal drilled and you think “I wish I could use my iPhone”.

I’m not sure what I’d have Twittered about while under anasthetic, but I know it would have been interesting.

Image courtesy of Carolyn Schweitzer

How the net is changing business

We often talk about how the internet is changing marketing and distribution, but we often overlook just how fundamental the basic ways we do business are changing.

Internet tools like social networks and the web itself are forcing us to be more honest, open and ethical.

This occurred to me during the annual Cannes Lions International Advertising Festival a few weeks ago, where I was fortunate to go along and see how the advertising sector is dealing with challenges to their clients’ traditional marketing channels while a global financial downturn hits business.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer put the worst case scenario of the world economy resetting to lower debt levels with marketing spend declining faster than GDP, as newspapers and magazines vanish at the same time consumers tighten belts.

Perhaps it was to be expected that Google CEO Eric Schmidt had the opposite view that Americans were too wedded to their credit cards to do anything else but spend.

The marketing bosses of Proctor & Gamble, Kraft and McDonalds had a very different outlook to either of the CEOs. They saw online advertising growing, while print and broadcast spending stays static – the most quoted statistic was the net occupies 20% of consumer’s time while only 7% of budgets are allocated to internet marketing.

A splash of cold water was from Kofi Annan and Bob Geldof who launched the “tck tck tck”, Time for Climate Justice campaign to get real results from the UN Copenhagen Convention in December. Their speeches were compelling and a reminder that some things are bigger than how much you spend online.

Back in the online world, Twitter co-founder Biz Stone gave an entertaining talk on how Twitter came about and some of the possibilities for making money from the service (charging for richer data) but the best social media talk was from Kevin Eyres, LinkedIn’s Managing Director for Europe.

Kevin’s key point is a business’s social media profile is just as much from what employees say on Twitter, Facebook and MySpace, as it is of customer’s comments and the efforts of the marketing team.

This is spot on and shows just how broad the risks and opportunities are for managers and entrepreneurs.

Modern management has to be honest and consistent – the days of hollow mission statements and empty commitments to customer service and equal opportunity are over.

If you don’t hold by your principles then your customers, staff and suppliers will rat you out to the wider world. If you do hold by them you’ll gain respect and true followers.

The final thing from the Cannes Festival was just how innovative and creative the world advertising industry is. While the prize winners were impressive there were many clever entries that changed the way you’ll look at marketing.

Luckily, most of them are online at the Cannes Lions website, so have a look at the speakers and get some inspiration from the entrants. Don’t copy them though as you’ll probably be dobbed in on Twitter.

Why paying for Twitter followers is a dumb idea

I’ve just read the Smart Company article on uSocial’s Social Media marketing services. I find the idea of paying for followers in Twitter, or friends in Facebook or contacts in LinkedIn, bizarre.

What uSocial’s prospective clients don’t understand is social media isn’t a game to collect the most fans, it’s a way of building communities around you and your brand.

It’s far better to have twenty passsionate fans than two thousand Twitter followers who just ignore you anyway.

To build a community you need people who care about what you do, your product or your brand. If you have to pay to get the appearance of having people who care that shows you don’t have anything worth caring about.

You can’t buy friends online or offline, so save your money and focus on why you’re different and why people should love what you do.

Criticism

One of the odd things about people criticising you on the Internet is how often they read the wrong things into words.

A case in point are the replies to this Smart Company column.

The funny thing is I agree with every point he makes and if he left it at that all would be sweet and the reader better informed.

But he doesn’t and he drops this little bomb;

The notion that it “cost them nothing” is also misleading as unless you think though the consequences of beginning such engagement, say through Twitter, then it can cost you a lot more than you are prepared to give.

Misleading?

Accusing a writer of misleading readers is pretty serious. It’s even more galling when the quote is taken out of context.

This is the strange thing about the Internet, people do silly things and it hurts their credibility.