Yahoo!7’s purchase of Australian group buying service Spreets last week is great news for the Sydney startup’s founders and investors, but these deals aren’t so great for our economy, businesses and innovation.
The mark of the late 1990s tech bubble was the “renovation rescue” model of building start up businesses. Just like keen property speculators, this model involves an angel or venture capital investor putting in enough money for the founders to do enough – either by growing the business or embarking on a PR campaign – to attract the attention of potential buyers.
For the business founders that can be a lucrative result, but it often distorts the priorities of a new endeavour as the investors are focused on a quick exit instead of building a durable, long term enterprise.
This has a bigger effect on markets as incumbents buy out young, smart and innovative new entrants. Good examples of this were the buyouts of successful online shopping services by the major retailers in the early 2000s.
Once purchased, the large corporations let innovation and fresh thinking in the start up business wither and die as the larger business’ bureaucracy and management hubris subsumes the acquisition. Few acquired businesses avoid this fate.
Which brings us to the buyer in the Spreets transaction. At the press conference announcing the deal Yahoo!7’s CEO Rohan Lund said “we’re seeing social, mobility e-commerce completely changing the way we use the web at the moment.”
Rohan’s absolutely right on this – location based services are changing advertising and retail – the problem is Yahoo!7 has no local business capacity and relies on News Limited’s True Local directories.
Perversely if Yahoo!7 are successful in building up their mobile, location based services it’s actually News Limited that will get most of the benefit.
A similar situation exists with Cudo, the competing joint venture between PBL and Microsoft, which relies on Sensis’ Yellow Pages.
That Rupert Murdoch and Telstra stand to gain as much, if not more, from the efforts of Yahoo!7, Microsoft and PBL is an indicator of just how fuzzy the thinking is behind many big business acquisitions.
A bigger threat to these ventures is Google who last week announced their intention to start up their own group buying service. Given Google already have a local business platform that supports coupons, it’s going to make them a tough competitor.
Assuming big corporations will dominate this space may be flawed as the group buying business relies on hands on, aggressive sales people feeding a pipeline of interesting and compelling offers to the subscribers. Short the daily deals start becoming boring or perceived poor value, subscribers will ignore the emails and take their shopping elsewhere.
Strangely of all the Australian big businesses in this space Sensis, with their Yellow Pages sales network, and News Limited, through their media selling and classifieds networks, should have the capacity to launch successful competitors.
Despite Sensis launching their own group buying service it’s hard to think that either Yellow Pages or True Local can succeed in this space. Similarly with Google, the “hands-off” web 2.0 way of doing business simply won’t work in a market that requires a motivated sales team to drive the product.
Recognising that lack of selling expertise probably drove Google to offer 6 billion dollars to buy the group buying innovator Groupon last year. An offer which Groupon rejected.
Google’s track record on successfully integrating acquisitions outside of online advertising has been poor and is probably one of the reasons Groupon CEO and founder Andrew Mason rejected the offer.
Andrew Mason, like Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook and Geoff Bezos at Amazon, rejected the VC ‘renovation rescue’ model and while it’s early days yet for Groupon, there’s many indications they’ll be able to build a game changing, innovative business just like Amazon and Facebook.
While we should congratulate those like Spreets who do manage a big buyout, we should keep in mind those stories are the exceptions and don’t represent the experience of most business founders.
New businesses really change our society is when they challenge the incumbents and build new industries. We should keep that in mind.