Sep 082011
 
radio programs for techonology, web, social media, cloud computing and computer advice

The September 11 ABC 702 Sydney Weekends segment discussed what Steve Jobs’ stepping down as Apple CEO means for Mac users.

Simon Marnie and Paul Wallbank looked at why Steve Jobs was important to Apple, who will be taking over and whether this affects whether you should buy an Mac computer, iPhone or iPad.

Listeners’ Questions

As usual, we had plenty of great questions from listeners and some of them we promised to get back to, these included the following.

Removing Mackeeper

Cheryl called about MacKeeper warnings that keep popping up on her Apple computer.

MacKeeper, and other variants like MacProtector and MacSecurity, are known as malware – software designed for malicious reasons – which has been the bane of Windows computer users for years.

Removing Mackeeper is relatively easy and Apple has released a security patch to fix it. Details and download are available at the Apple Support website.

Wiping an old computer

The most valuable thing on a computer is the data, so it’s important to wipe any system before disposing of it. Deborah asked how to wipe her old Mac system before she left it out for her council’s e-waste collection.

If you have an OS X or OS 9 disk, you can completely wipe and “zero” the disk to make it extremely difficult for someone to recover any data from the old computer. Apple have detailed instructions on this at their How To Zero All Data On A Disk page.

Warning! Before following these instructions, make sure you have backed up all important and valuable data.

How to disable automatic Windows Updates

Updating your computer, whether you have a Windows or Mac computer, is very important as new security bugs are found all the time. Gary though was finding his system automatically installing Windows Updates often disrupts his work.

It isn’t a good idea to totally disable the Windows Update service as those updates and patches are important, but you can change the settings so they are downloaded but not installed until you choose to do so.

Microsoft’s Knowledge Base describes how to change the Windows Update Settings, we recommend the download updates but let me choose when to install them option.

Next 702 Weekends tech spot

Our next Weekends spot is scheduled for 23rd October when we’ll be discussing how to backup your valuable data. Check the Events Page or subscribe to our newsletter for any changes to the 702 Sydney programs and any other upcoming radio shows.

Similar posts:

Aug 252011
 
how to deal with bad reviews on online social media and web sites

Last Christmas a group of office workers gathered at a city hotel to celebrate the year’s end. The meal was a disaster as slow, surly staff made mistakes and delivered poorly cooked food.

Within an hour of the workers returning from lunch, negative reviews of the hotel started appearing on the Eatability and Urbanspoon websites. By the time Christmas Day rolled around, the reputation of the establishment was throughly trashed.

The rise of online review sites along with social media services like Facebook challenges many businesses, particularly those in the hospitality industry as café owners, restaurateurs and hotel managers struggle with unfavourable comments about their establishments.

Customers now research on the web before deciding to dine out or make a purchase, so online reviews can make or break an establishment. How does a business make sure their online reputation is safe.

Pay attention

The most important part is to pay attention to what people are saying about your business.

Big corporations will have their own social media staff and community managers to handle much of this, Telstra last week announced their online team will now be on the web 24/7.

Larger organisations will also subscribe to online monitoring services like BuzzNumbers and PeopleBrowsr to report what’s being said about them.

For smaller businesses it falls on the owner and staff to keep an eye on the popular review sites and to monitor the business’ Facebook page for negative comments.

Engage the critics

No matter how good your business is, you will get the odd unhappy customer. When that happens you need to contact them, preferably through the same public forum they have complained about you.

Once you’ve established contact, take the discussion offline onto email, phone or even face to face meetings. If the resolution is positive, try to publicise the result in the original channel the complaint was made.

Fix the problem

Despite many in the hotel industry believing that most online complaints are deliberate campaigns against them, regular complaints are usually legitimate and indicate an underlying systemic problem in the business.

If customers are complaining about service, you need to let your staff know customers are talking about them. Should there be regular criticisms of your food, then you need to talk to your kitchen staff or suppliers.

Don’t get defensive

Complaints happen. Even the best business in the world has a bad day or encounters a customer who woke up on the wrong side of bed.

If you think the criticism is unfair or even defamatory, don’t get angry and certainly do not make threats as you’ll only inflame the situation more.

Should the customer turn out to be unreasonable, at least by having publicly engaged them you’ll have shown the public you’re calm, professional and trustworthy.

Don’t Lie

The web is as great at exposing falsehoods as it is at spreading them. If you’re clearly not telling the truth, you’ll make your critics angrier and more determined to damage your reputation.

A common way many businesses cheat online is with false reviews. Despite industry claims that organised damaging comments are widespread, the reality is the opposite as many hoteliers and restaurateurs frequently post clumsy and obviously fake glowing reviews of their establishments. It’s a bad look and the establishment often ends up looking foolish.

Get your website right

Many businesses, particularly in hospitality, have lousy websites or a site that has no Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) so when someone searches for a hotel or restaurant their page comes up way below those for review sites or critical blog posts.

Regularly review how your site is doing and talk to your web designer or SEO consultant on making sure it’s coming up well when customers search for your type of business.

It’s important not to overlook local search services so ensure your business has been listed on Google Places and has a Facebook Local Business Page otherwise local searches will go to the online review sites or your competitors.

Ultimately, the best way to deal with negative online reviews is to minimise them by running a good business. The biggest effect the web is having on business is that it is making us accountable to our customers.

As big corporations are finding, the days of covering up poor goods and indifferent customer service with marketing is over – if your product doesn’t match the promise you make to your customers they will tell the world.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
Aug 132011
 
how social media sites are processing and manufacturing our private information

Most of us accept that things we don’t pay for – such as broadcast TV and Internet sites – are supported by advertising or have some sort of catch in order to pay their bills.

Social media sites have been a great example of this, millions of users on services like Facebook and LinkedIn have accepted targeted advertising and the associated privacy trade offs as the cost of getting a free online service.

The price of “free” though is escalating, the social networks have moved on from just using our data for displaying advertisements to processing our private information and distributing it in ways we may have never expected.

Professional networking site LinkedIn caused an uproar last week when their social advertising feature started adding what appeared to be users’ personal endorsements to adverts for products, businesses and websites based on behaviour monitored by the site’s tracking software.

Facebook, the leading social networking site, also had a recent privacy scare when users discovered the services’ Phonebook feature gleefully displays all the mobile phone numbers of their online contacts and, given the right settings, merges them with those from a mobile phone.

The recently launched Google Plus takes these risks even further as the search engine giant requires a personal profile before you can use the service which can then be integrated into your search and email histories.

What we’ve ‘Liked’ or ‘Followed’ online – or even just looked at – is now being processed, regurgitated and delivered to our friends and the public as endorsements and recommendations just like a retired sportsman selling air conditioners or hair restoration products.

At least the retired cricketer flogging hair products or long past it soap opera star promoting washing powder gets a paycheck, all a social media user gets from the transaction the privilege of sharing their private information along with personal and professional relationships with a multinational advertising platform.

In some ways the social advertising functions are worse for the user than the celebrity endorsement; most people know the retired sportsman or actress is doing it for a paycheck, the social network advertising clearly implies your friends like that product or company.

We should also remember it’s not just the sites themselves, one of the reasons for Facebook’s popularity has been the games and applications people can use. Every one of these features has some access to your data and most have a business model for using it to make a buck.

It’s become common for online applications to send out messages on new users’ accounts, pretending to be a personal message from them. Just this week a new service invoked the ire of Facebook’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, for doing exactly this.

This processing of our own data and services is a logical step for social media services desperate to justify billion dollar valuations of their business but few people signed up to these sites to endorse random products or allow someone else to send advertising on their behalf.

Privacy is no longer the issue with social media services, we’ve now moved into the corporate ownership of our identities. What a corporate algorithm decides are our likes is now being processed and publicly displayed as our endorsements, our tastes and dislikes.

What interests us, what we enjoy and what we like forms the core of our identities, friendships and personalities. That social media sites seek to take this from us should be our greatest concern with these platforms.

We need to be careful with what, and whom, we share, like and connect with online.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
Aug 012011
 
business customer service is essential in the new economy

There’s a fundamental flaw in the way the tech industry does business, that weakness could be what ultimately kills many of today’s new media, web and social media services.

AirBnB, an online home share service, is one of the darlings of the booming Silicon Valley start up sector, having recently being valued at $1.2 billion after a successful capital raising.

Like most Web 2.0 and social media businesses, AirBnB’s advantage is in the low operating costs where customer support is left to the service’s peer review and social media communities while AirBnB pockets a commission for simply making the connection between the landlord and tenant.

The flaws in this “all care, no responsibility” model became apparent last month when a lady posted a description of her house being ransacked by an errant housesitter she found through AirBnB.

AirBnB’s management responded to the article with assurances they were helping and working with their affected customer, claims which were promptly contradicted by the original victim.

To make matters worse, certain prominent members of the Silicon Valley investment and blogging communities alluded she was lying or was “batshit crazy.” Now that other stories of bad AirBnB tenants are appearing, the view this is simply the untrustworthy word of a deranged customer affected by their first such incident is looking hollow.

Failing to deal with customer problems is not unique to AirBnB, jiding behind impenetrable layers of “support” backed up by user hostile terms and conditions is familiar to anyone who has had to deal with an online service gone wrong.

Last month Thomas Monopoly found he was locked out of his Google account and had it not been for the intervention of a senior Google employee, Thomas’ problem would probably still be stuck in an endless feedback loop.

Exactly the same problem has been encountered thousands of times by other users of web mail, social media, online auction and matchmaking sites.

Many of the people running these services retort their products are free so users get the support the support they pay for – an argument conveniently overlooking that most “free” web services are based around selling customer data – but even this does not justify delivering the basic services users have been lead to expect, regardless of what a 5,000 word user agreement states.

Today’s tech startups, and many of their big established cousins in the IT industry, have the idea that customer support is an optional extra and an expense to minimised or outsourced.

In this respect they are not too far removed from dinosaur car manufacturers or some of today’s less dynamic retailers offering little in the way of customer service or after sales support.

That way of working has died as consumers have been able to go online to vent their dissatisfaction, strangely today’s hot tech start ups seem to have missed this aspect of the revolution they have helped start.

Ignoring consumer problems is exactly what’s bringing traditional businesses unstuck in the online world. The funny thing is it might bring many of the online business undone as well.

Similar posts:

Jul 292011
 
respecting your business relationships is important in a time of change

All too often a discussion of business leadership descends into a series of homilies and recycled stories equating corporate warriors to ancient Chinese generals.

In a time where we’re obsessed with the shiny toys of technology, we often forget that all business is social and leadership and respect are the keys to growing a successful enterprise.

Last week’s final session of the 2011 Let’s Talk Business series was refreshingly different with David James of Sydney’s Brasserie Bread, Mike Cannon-Brookes of software company Atlassian and business mentor Chris Witt telling their stories of leading growing enterprises.

Mike and David showed how real business leadership is about entrenching values within in an organisation that fosters consistently good service and great products.

David told how Brasserie Bread treat their retail partners with generous commissions and services that encourage cross selling illustrated the key difference between smaller businesses taking the long view and the short term views taken by corporate managers.

The cross selling and commission models work well for Brasserie Bread’s retailers, the customer comes into a shop to pick up their bread order, buys a coffee while they are there and – as they discover more about the business – they become a regular.

While there’s a great difference between a bakery and software company, Mike Cannon-Brookes had a similar view about values, telling how Atlassian has the “beer test” where they ask if a prospective employee would be interesting when talking over an after work drink.

Atlassian’s main mantra though is “don’t f*** the customer”, which is notable in a business world largely dominated by the belief you give the customer the minimum you can get away with.

Both Brasserie Bread’s and Atlassian’s philosophies can be boiled down to one word: Respect.

Respecting customers, suppliers, staff and resellers is something that’s forgotten by many larger businesses obsessed with short term gains at the expense of anyone foolish or unfortunate enough to do business with them.

The current problems of big retailers can be put down to that lack of respect; for suppliers as they screwed the last cent out of their supply chains, for staff as they crudely cut numbers to achieve their performance targets and for customers who found service had become a word with little meaning in their stores.

It would be unfair to pick on the retailers though as most large organisations share that attitude of disrespecting everyone who doesn’t sit on the same floor as the CEO.

Much of these beliefs on blindly cutting costs, outsourcing service and focusing on short term KPIs came out of 1980s thinking at consulting firms and management schools.

Although the schools and consultants have updated their thinking, many business leaders are stuck in that short term model which worked well during the two decades of easy credit we’ve went through up to 2008.

Chris Witt summed this short term thinking up well with his closing comment; “Neanderthal man’s survival strategy was short term, it didn’t do him much good.”

Respecting your business relationships is the key to long term survival in these uncertain times, we need to be insuring we show the respect to our staff, supplier, customers and partners we hope they would give us.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
Jul 272011
 
Google+ is Google's latest attempt at a social media service

The latest shiny thing in the online world is Google+, the search engine monolith’s latest attempt at a social networking service. What does it mean to the average user?

Google+ differs from most social networks – particularly Facebook – in that you can segment your online connections into different groups called circles so when sharing information such as comments, updates or photos you can choose to only let certain circles or individuals see those posts.

This addresses the biggest problem with social media; that what we share with our family is not necessarily what we want our friends or work colleagues to see, an issue identified by then Google designer Paul Adams, who has since moved onto Facebook.

At the core of Google+ is the Google Profile which is shared with most Google services such as Gmail and Blogger which gives rise to quite a few privacy concerns as those you share with can get access to this information, although this is the same with most other social media services.

Google+ has quite a few interesting features such as Hangouts which allow impromptu video conferences and Sparks which are random popups of things you might be interested based upon your search history and posts.

As a consumer product, Google+ doesn’t have the gaming and the social features that Facebook offers however that’s expected to change as the product develops.

For businesses, Google+ is off limits. Right now it is only open to individuals although we can expect that will change as Google integrate the product with their small business Places platform along with adwords and their online application service.

Right now Google+ is for the geeks and that’s why the tech media is talking about it. For the average home or business users it’s not quite ready to replace or complement Facebook or other social media services although it’s worth keeping an eye on to see how it evolves.

The stakes are quite high for Google with this product as the overwhelming amount of data at every Internet user’s fingertips is seeing people seeking out sources they trust for answers, recommendations and advice. The social aspect of the online world is going to define the web in this decade just as search did in the previous decade.

For this reason, Google are going to be working hard on making sure Google+ is part of the social web, for the average user we’ll be choosing the tools we trust. It remains to be seen if Google+ is one of those tools.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
May 112011
 
silver surfer on the beach

“For those of us aged over forty, we don’t use the web. And neither do our customers!”

An audience member threw this statement to the panel at last night’s Let’s Talk Business seminar discussing The New Consumer. One of the panel members, Adam Ferrier of Naked Communications, replied flatly; “you’re wrong”.

That business owner assumed her own likes, priorities and experience are shared by her customers. This isn’t always true, what we think is true about our clients and markets often proves not to be the case.

Just because you don’t have time to surf the web, use social media or play online games doesn’t mean your clients aren’t using these tools.

Assuming that the internet is for young folk means your business focus is on older people who don’t use the net – which is probably the fastest declining segment in our society as seniors move online.

The US based Pew Internet Survey’s Generations Online in 2010 Report reported older user were rapidly increasing their net use while in Australia the 2010 Sensis ebusiness report came to the same findings saying;

“The groups most likely to report below average usage were those aged 65 and above and retirees. For those Australians 65 years and above only 66 per cent reported accessing the internet in the past 12 months. However, usage in this age group has increased by six percentage points over the past year.” – p. 17 Sensis e-business report.

Six percentage points to 66% represents 10% growth in the over 65 age group. At that rate we’ll see the seniors reaching the 97 to 98% levels of Internet usage sometime in 2013 and the 50-64 year age group will be there next year.

Restricting your business to an 8%  slice of the market  – which will soon be 3% – is up to you, it may well be that is where your customers are. But it’s a big risk and one you wouldn’t want to make on some blind assumptions.

Many of us may be too old to surf the point at North Narrabeen, but we’re all using the web and older users are the fastest growing group. Rather than assuming your customers aren’t going online, it’s time to ask them what they are doing with their computers.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
Mar 132011
 
social media is about connecting with friends

Fancy half price seafood dinners, deeply discounted electrical goods or 80% off personal fitness training? Thousands of people who’ve signed up for group buying websites certainly do and hundreds of businesses are prepared to make big discounts to attract those customers.

What are these services? Are they worthwhile and how do the businesses make money from them? Should customers be wary of advertised big savings and are merchants cutting their throats when they enter the world of deep discounting?

What are group buying websites?

The idea behind group buying sites is that merchants will offer cheap deals to take advantage of bulk sales, clear inventory or as loss leaders to attract new business. The products offered can be anything from a cheap haircut through to discounted whitegoods or a cheap meal.

Customers subscribe to the group buying websites and receive a daily email detailing the deals in their areas. If they like an offer, they can choose to be part of it and if it goes ahead, their credit will be debited and they’ll receive a voucher for the deal.

The group buying websites usually approach businesses to take part. For the privilege of having their businesses featured, the website takes between 20 and 100% of the offer price as commission.

What are the consumer benefits?

Naturally the main attraction for consumers are the cheap deals on offer. Some businesses are offering 80% off their list prices for products, so there can be substantial savings to be made.

There’s also the opportunity to try out products or outlets you wouldn’t normally try for instance you might not usually be interested in Zumba classes, canoe hire or replacing your TV at normal prices but an 50% discount could tweak your attention.

Are there risks for the consumer?

There’s no such thing as a free lunch so there are a number of risks when using a group buying site.

Impulse buying is probably the biggest risk, if you’re a sucker for a deal then these sites will love you. It’s an opportunity to sign up for a lot of things you don’t really need, probably will never have used and maybe can’t even afford, but fact you saved 80% makes you feel good.

There’s also the risk you’re not really getting the full discount. A lot of canny merchants inflate the list price to make the amount off look greater. Many also reduce the size or quality of the discounted product to recover their margins.

A big risk is that you may never get to use your voucher. Either you’ll forget about the voucher you received or the merchant is so overwhelmed by the offer’s response that they can never get around to catering for all their people who took them up.

Finally there’s the spam factor. Many merchants see a group buying offer as an opportunity to build their mailing lists, so you may find yourself being spammed for fitness classes and restaurant offers for a long time after you take up a deal.

Business Benefits

These sites wouldn’t have taken off if there weren’t businesses to advertise on them and hundreds of merchants have taken up the opportunity. So there are clear benefits for the outlets that use these services.

The most obvious one is they get to promote their businesses. All of these sites claim to have subscribers numbering in the hundreds of thousands, so it’s an opportunity to get your products in front of a large audience.

Clearing excess capacity has been one of the main drivers for these sites in the United States where many businesses have found themselves with too much inventory or staff sitting around. These sites are a great way of clearing inventory or smoothing demand cycles.

Business downsides

The first problem is that excess stock. A business can’t afford to be carrying stock that requires big discounts to clear, if these offers become a regular feature then your business is in trouble.

Even if your business isn’t in trouble, these offers risk devaluing your brand. As the major retailers have found, offering frequent discounts trains your customers to expect lower prices.

Offering these bargains may alienate existing clients. Those customers who are prepared to pay full price aren’t only going to be irritated to find they could have got your products cheaper, but may also be unhappy with your business being overwhelmed by cheaper, price conscious clients.

Those price sensitive shoppers aren’t really your customers either; they are loyal to the buying platform and cheap deals, so if your competitors have an offer later on another platform, those customers will go there. There’s a lot of work to be done converting these bargain hunters into repeat clients.

One of the most misunderstood parts of group buying sites is the commission structure, most of the services charge a commission of between 20 and 50% – with some going up to 100% – on the advertised price, so that 50% discount to the customer is actually 60 to 75% off the merchant’s selling price. This can be a massive hit to a business’ profit.

Is group buying for you?

For businesses group buying sites can be a good idea if they are used as a part of a well thought out marketing strategy or to clear occasional excess stock. But they shouldn’t be seen as a quick way to attract new customers.

Customers are the big winners from group buying sites, as it’s the opportunity to pick up some great deals. But users have to use a bit of judgement instead of just jumping for the best looking deals.

It’s an old saying, but if anything looks to be too good to be true then it probably is. In the Internet age, that saying is probably truer than ever. Group buying sites can be good for both businesses and customers, but watch the wallet.

Similar posts:

Feb 252011
 
road rules

I’m currently writing a book, provisionally titled Seven Steps to Online Success. One of the chapters looks at using social media for business and I included twelve rules to keep businesses out of online purgatory.

On reviewing that chapter, the rules really apply to the web in general. So, with a little bit of editing, here are the 12 rules for using the web;

1. Show respect to everyone. Even people you find disturbing, you’ll quickly learn the Internet is mankind’s gift to the disturbed, deluded and downright deranged.
2. Listen. Once you’ve filtered out the crazies, you’ll find the collective intelligence of the web can be quite powerful.
3. Converse. The big currency in social media is conversation, by joining in with constructive comments you enhance your reputation.
4. Be constructive. Add value to the conversation
5. Positivity. The web rewards the positive more than the negative, by all means post critical comments, but it’s best to for your posts to be more positive than negative.
6. Be honest. Social media has a horrible way of catching people out, so don’t tell porkies.
7. Associate with the smart kids. You’re judged by the company you keep, just like in the school ground.
8. Don’t constantly plug your services. You’ll be branded a spammer and shunned.
9. Social media is not a numbers game. Don’t obsess about the number of Twitter followers or Facebook friends. Quality beats quantity every time.
10. Never post when drunk or emotional. You will regret it.
11. Step away. If you find a social media channel is taking up too much of your time or passion, take a break.
12. Learn. Use what you’ve learned.

Seven Steps to Online Success is due out in Australian bookstores in June. In the meantime, my new business Netsmarts is running workshops helping businesses use Google and News Limited’s free local search services to grow their business.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts
Dec 112010
 
venetian mask

In October 2010 Newsweek’s Jessica Bennett asked the the team behind the Internet service Reputation Defender to find all they could about her.

The results were startling, within half an hour they had found her US social security number and a few more hours digging revealed her address, hometown as well as many other private details.

But ultimately the picture of Jessica’s life was wrong. The team made mistakes about her personal habits, sexual orientation and the time she spends online.

The fact the profile was incorrect shows how difficult it is for computers, or people, to understand an individual based on a series of data points.

Most of us understand that making a generalisation based on single data point – say race, gender, appearance or sexual orientation – is usually incorrect, but when we add more data points things become even more difficult.

Once we get more than one data point, we have to start weighting them. Would Jessica eating at McDonalds twice a week outweigh her exercising every morning in the eyes of an insurance company assessing her risk?

That problem could be called the Google effect where a formula, known as an algorithm, becomes so complex that it becomes bogged down under the weight of its own assumptions as we saw with Tony Russo’s gaming of the search engine’s ranking system.

All of us as are steadily revealing more about ourselves onto the web, whether we know it or not. Every time we like something on Facebook, subscribe to a newsletter or make a comment on a blog post, we are giving a little something about us away on the publicly accessible Internet.

Over time, anyone can build a picture of us. However it may turn out that nobody will want to know about the detailed, complex and multi dimensional portrait each of our lives would be.

As information about all of us becomes more available, we may enter a modern version of the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine of the Cold War as each of us find that everyone around us has enough information to bring our careers, relationships and status crashing down.

But equally we hold equally damaging data about all our peers as well and to bring anybody down based on this information we have would be to invite the wrath of many others who know about our intimate details.

We may even find that because all of us, being human, have some damaging traits and history that employers, insurers and governments only care when you start hiding them. Today we see this with security vetting procedures which are more concerned about what we hide rather than the specifics of our foibles and indiscretions.

The assumption of those security agencies is that a self admitted gambler, alcoholic or philanderer is a manageable risk while those hiding such secrets from their families and employers are the genuine threat to an organisation.

So we come back to a society where a tacit agreement exists between us all that this dangerous power is only used when someone has acted illegally or hypocritically.

Perhaps that is the future we are heading for, where the Internet knows all but we simply choose not to access it. Which assumes it’s all correct anyway.

Similar posts:

  • No Related Posts